Obama has a problem with truth ... the story below by Jim Miklaszewski, Chief Pentagon Correspondent of NBC, directly conflicts with Obama's Sunday night version of the raid ... and Obama was supposedly watching and directing the event in real time from the "situation room"?

Then, 3 US Senators claim to have seen photographs of Bin Laden's dead body, then later recant their story after White House officials state that no pictures have been shown to Members of Congress (reminiscent of Hillary's lie about coming under gunfire at the Sarajevo airport which she later brushed off as having "mis-spoken").

It would seem that there are at least two kinds of lies: 1) The Bill Clinton Type (Type 1), stating that he "did not have sexual relations with that woman Miss Lewinsky", which is really a denial of truth, and which is at least understandable, as he was trying to cover his ass in a personal matter; and, 2) The Hillary Clinton Type (Type 2), which is purposely manufacturing false information which has no basis in reality or truth, which I find far more sinister and evil, as it is meant to deceive others.

Obama seems to exhibit Type 2 behaviour, and that is why I cannot trust him or believe anything that he says. Bill Clinton was far more truthful than Obama in his everyday dealings than Obama ... or Hillary.

I think the manner in which Bin Laden was captured and killed unarmed (when it is becoming quite clear that we had the opportunity to take him alive) is going to ultimately damage our national image, and the manner in which his body was disposed of will create everlasting doubt that he was truly captured ... it's not just "deathers" here in our country ... there are people all over the world who do not believe that Bin Laden was captured and killed. Sure, the Obama method was the expedient, but it lacks the integrity, dignity and honor which we ascribe to our system of justice ... that we openly and fearlessly pursue and bring criminals to justice, no matter the cost or consequences.

Before you go to the main article below, read what Dr. Rowan Williams, ArchBishop of Canterbury, had to say about the event:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/05/bin-laden-uncomfortable-feeling-rowan-williams

Bin Laden killing left 'uncomfortable feeling' – Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury breaks his silence over the killing of al-Qaida leader saying justice must be seen to be done

Riazat Butt, religious affairs correspondent guardian.co.uk, Thursday 5 May 2011 14.25 BST Article history


The archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, said the killing of Osama bin Laden had left a 'very uncomfortable feeling'. Photograph: Steve Parsons/PA

The archbishop of Canterbury has said the killing of Osama bin Laden left a "very uncomfortable feeling" because it appeared as if justice had not been done.

Bin Laden was shot dead in his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, on Sunday. It has since emerged that he was unarmed when US Navy Seals fired at him.

Lambeth Palace had previously refused to comment on the death of Bin Laden but, when asked at a press conference what he thought of the killing, Dr Rowan Williams replied: "I think the killing of an unarmed man is always going to leave a very uncomfortable feeling; it doesn't look as if justice is seen to be done.

"I don't know the full details any more than anyone else. I think it's also true that different versions of events have not done a great deal to help.

"In such circumstances, when we are faced with someone who was manifestly a war criminal in terms of the atrocities inflicted, it is important that justice is seen to be done."

Earlier in the week, the archbishop of York gave a measured response to the dramatic events in Pakistan, saying people should not celebrate Bin Laden's death and that the terror chief was "evil but not Satan".

And, now for the main story: Be sure to watch the 4 videos and see the picture slideshow. Let me know what you think.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42906279/ns/world_news-death_of_bin_laden

Bin Laden 'firefight': Only one man was armed
He was killed early on at guest house, and four others — including al-Qaida leader — never fired a shot


By Jim Miklaszewski
Chief Pentagon correspondent

NBC News NBC News
updated 1 hour 49 minutes ago 2011-05-05T13:29:59

Four of the five people shot to death in the operation that killed Osama bin Laden, including the al-Qaida leader himself, were unarmed and never fired a shot, U.S. officials told NBC News on Wednesday — an account that differs markedly from the Obama administration's original claims that the Navy SEALs came under heavy small-arms fire in a prolonged firefight.



According to the officials' account, as the first SEAL team moved into the compound, they took small-arms fire from the guest house in the compound. The SEALs returned fire, killing bin Laden's courier and the courier's wife, who died in the crossfire.

The second SEAL team entered the first floor of the main residence and could see a man standing in the dark with one hand behind his back. Fearing he was hiding a weapon, the SEALs shot and killed the lone man, who turned out to be unarmed.

As the U.S. commandos moved through the house, they found several stashes of weapons and barricades, as if the residents were prepared for a violent and lengthy standoff — which never materialized.

The SEALs then made their way up a staircase, where they ran into one of bin Laden's sons on the way down. The Americans immediately shot and killed the son, who was also unarmed.

Once on the third floor, the commandos threw open the door to bin Laden's bedroom. One of bin Laden's wives rushed toward the NAVY SEAL in the door, who shot her in the leg.

Then, without hesitation, the same commando turned his gun on bin Laden, standing in what appeared to be pajamas, and fire two quick shots, one to the chest and one to the head. Although there were weapons in that bedroom, Bin Laden was also unarmed at the time he was shot.

Instead of a chaotic firefight, US officials says, the American commando assault was a precision operation, with SEALs moving carefully through the compound, room to room, floor to floor.

In fact, most of the operation was spent in what the military calls “exploiting the site,” gathering up the computers, hard drives, cellphones and files that could provide valuable intelligence on al Qaeda operatives and potential operations worldwide.

The U.S. officials describing the operation said the SEALs carefully gathered up 22 women and children to ensure they were not harmed. Some of the women were put in “flexi-cuffs” the plastic straps used to bind someone’s hands at the wrists, and left them for Pakistani security forces to discover.

But despite the fact that only one of those killed was armed, everyone was considered a serious threat, the U.S. officials said.

Accounts of the operation had varied widely in the first few days after it was completed.

White House officials initially suggested bin Laden had been holding a gun and perhaps firing at U.S. forces. There was a report that he used his wife as a human shield.

The Associated Press quoted U.S. officials on Tuesday as saying that the SEALs shot him after they saw him appear to lunge for a weapon.

CIA Director Leon Panetta told "PBS NewsHour" that bin Laden "made some threatening moves" that "represented a clear threat to our guys" but was not more specific about what the unarmed terrorist did as the commandos engaged others at the compound and burst into his room.