Rhetorical or otherwise?

Operations Darknet and PedoChat I support.

I don't support attacks on the FBI or Paypal.

I support attacks on corrupt government officials in the Ukraine.

I don't support attacking RIAA websites.

I support the free exchange of data, even data they claim shouldn't be freely exchanged.

Another Anon believes, and supports, the exact opposite positions of mine listed above.

We are both still Anonymous.

Who is the rogue element? Who is spouting rhetorical nonsense?

Completely differing opinions and beliefs, with actions taken in support of those opinions and beliefs.

We are both still Anonymous.

There are no heretics when there is no heresy.

We are both still Anonymous because we identify as such. If my ideas are supported by more Anons, our actions will have a greater impact on the world. If his ideas are supported by more Anons, his actions will have a greater impact on the world.