You post some bitchy passive aggressive shit, so I extrapolate you're a rapist, and with more basis I'll wager. So, like I say, go cry about it, princess.

And, damn, now there's a whole wall of text from the princess to deal with.

If you don't think teenagers should face the consequences of breaking the law, that's very sound advice. Not sure why anyone would think that's passive aggressive in any way, it has nothing to do with being passive aggressive. But let's keep going.

No. I said 'advising' me not to have kids was passive aggressive. You started in with the bitchy shit, and you get weepy when it heads back your way. And you think you're NOT a princess? Shit, I'd hate to see what you think IS precious behavior, princess.

Your conditional proposition is false; your analogous antecedent is not commensurable therefore the derivative consequents are invalid. Better now?

Actually, your interpretation of my conditional statement is incorrect, inasmuch as you decided said premise (here referred to as the antecedent) pertained specifically to an age group not specified either by implication or outright definition on my part, ergo what you claim to be the subsequent conclusion (or consequents)[sic]is, by logical progression, also incorrect.

Well, deliberately talking like a pretentious twat really does make one feel superior :/ But not really, because that was sarcasm.

Now I'm a princess because you trolled a discussion?

No, you're a princess because you can dish it out but whine about it when you get it back. That's okay, you whine away, P. I'm going to call you P. It's short for princess. :)"

and the rest was just you whining some more.