Tony Bull
Thu Sep 19, 2013 11:07am

Dear Rod

There're about 90 on the Kilham lot so far, and the Canadian branch will undoubtedly be interested - but there are some unresolved issues about that branch before I get in touch with Nadine with some questions

With such a large branch, we have to ask ourselves how to best to 'publish' it. In a situation like this, on my own FT, I have tended just to report the number of Children once the patronymic has been lost - but with the Hog*s I've sometimes had to progress down the tree a bit to try and track just who belongs to who(m?)

I the meanwhile, I could send you a narrative DUMP/and or GEDCOM to give you a taster


  • Re: The Kilham HoggarthsRod Hogarth (webmaster), Thu Sep 19 10:47am
    Hi Tony, Excellent! It sounds like you and Bryan have been busy. I'd be delighted to add a 'Kilham Hog*s' tree to this site, or indeed a 'Jigsaw Puzzle' page for that family if you'd like to share... more
    • Hog's — Tony Bull, Thu Sep 19 11:07am
      • Re: Hog*sRod Hogarth (webmaster), Thu Sep 19 12:17pm
        It rather looks like I jumped the gun when asking for input material for a page or FT for the descendants of Robert, as it sounds like you may have a bit more to do until you've finally got something ... more