Joe for Richard
Re: "experts"
Thu Jul 27, 2017 13:09

Richard, do you actually view the connection between the ransom note writing and Hauptmann's writing as something requiring a QDE to tell you? Those experts at the trial were not the only ones who are in agreement. No, it's not an airtight science, (can you name even one, given the nature of human perception within factual observation?) and mistakes have been made, but virtually every QDE since has that time up to the present day has had a field day with this comparison, and I don't believe for a second they're just dumping on poor old Hauptmann.

  • "experts"Richard E Sloan, Thu Jul 27 09:32
    handwriting experts are notorious for testifying for whoever pays them. SOme of Reilly's experts were jokes, and PUBLICLY the Osborns were NOT in agreement at first. ANd you do know whose "expertise" ... more
    • Re: "experts"steve for rich, Fri Jul 28 11:24
      your forgetting other 8 or 9 other experts who testified also, and some of the current ones said he wrote them
    • Re: "experts" — Joe for Richard, Thu Jul 27 13:09
      • "dem notes"Richard E Sloan, Fri Jul 28 11:44
        Despite the charlatans, I do strongly believe Bruno wrote all the notes (but Im still puzzled over the first one; it doesnt seem to look at all like his writing to me. Could that not also be the... more
Click here to receive daily updates