Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Sue for Richard
Solomon Shunned By Hauptmann?
Thu Dec 14, 2017 19:59

Hauptmann either said that he didn't want a lawyer or he didn't say it.

Do any of the books on the Lindbergh case mention H. Bennett Solomon, Esq.?

I don't have Dekle and Dedman's book, but maybe they mention Solomon?

Steve might know, or check the indexes of the books of the scholars on the Lindbergh case.

Maybe H. Bennett Solomon is a fictitious name in the Hauptmann case?

Who do we turn to in order to validate this information as it relates to H. Bennett Solomon, and whether or not Hauptmann turned this lawyer down?

Shouldn't Solomon's name have at least gotten an honorable mention in the literature?

  • Bruno and a lawyerRichard E Sloan, Thu Dec 14 14:28
    Re: "newspaper accts say that Hauptmann at the start did not want a lawyer." What is the source for the initial report that the papers all repeated? It can only be treated as "hearsay" with out that. ... more
    • Dual Personality -- Fisch?Sue for Richard, Fri Dec 15 18:40
      Lou Wedemar actually used the term 'dual pesonality" in the first of 10 articles about the Lindbergh case that appeared in the Rochester Evening Journal on November 19, 1934. He used that phrase... more
    • Re: Bruno and a lawyersteve for rich, Fri Dec 15 09:47
      hi rich, I think its in the intorogations at police headquarters if im not mistaken. I think they asked him if he wanted one
    • Solomon Shunned By Hauptmann? — Sue for Richard, Thu Dec 14 19:59
Click here to receive daily updates