Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Joe
Re: When testimony becomes tripe
Fri Apr 6, 2018 20:06
174.114.113.163

Having testified in so many cases and with so much experience, Trendley must have realized how little he had to work with within the Hauptmann handwriting evidence. Apparently, that didn't seem to stop him.

  • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Fri Apr 6 16:35
    Trendley had been an Expert for 37 years and testified as an Expert in over 380 trials prior to his Lindbergh testimony. Now, Osborn and Stein, both Experts, had found themselves on opposite sides... more
    • Re: When testimony becomes tripeMichael 5260 for Anonymous, Sat Apr 7 11:21
      I'm not aware of court cases where Albert S. Osborn and Elbridge W. Stein consistently appeared on opposite sides. If you have a list, or partial list, with the names of the court cases I will look... more
      • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Sat Apr 7 19:41
        That's all great information but yes, they did testify on opposite sides. Strikes me as stalling but whatever. I'll leave it up to you to do the proper research in order to discover this for... more
        • Re: When testimony becomes tripeMichael 5260 for Anonymous, Sun Apr 8 07:17
          You made the claim about Osborn and Stein. You must have done the research beforehand and know the names of the cases if you are making the assertion. Share the information with us. I would like to... more
          • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Sun Apr 8 08:18
            Yes I made it and yes I have the cases and/or references. Being an expert yourself you should already know, and if you don't shouldn't you be at the ready to research it yourself? You say you want to ... more
            • Re: When testimony becomes tripeMichael 5260 for Anonymous, Sun Apr 8 09:54
              You have the cases and/or references? I doubt it. If you did you would have plastered then all over the place to such an extent we would all need a barf bag. I'm supposed to do research that was... more
              • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Sun Apr 8 22:38
                You "doubt" it. Funny. Barf bag indeed. Project much? Once again, despite all of this fluff and attempts at sounding legit, you once again evade the point: Two experts you like were on opposite... more
                • Re: When testimony becomes tripeMichael 5260, Mon Apr 9 07:40
                  Of course I doubt it. You made the claim about Osborn and Stein. Yet you show us nothing. You think it's funny? I don't. "Project much"? Now you move us into the psychiatric realm? What does this... more
                  • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Tue Apr 10 08:16
                    You've lost your mind. You came here to bash Trendley unopposed. Sorry to interfere, but whatever you do don't let the facts get into the way. The next thing I know I "hate" Stein and Osborn?... more
    • Re: When testimony becomes tripe — Joe, Fri Apr 6 20:06
      • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Sat Apr 7 08:56
        You may not agree with his position, but my point was that in order to evaluate the man one must consider everything about him. He testified in cases where we know he was correct. He made a lot of so ... more
        • 2018 tour reunion?Richard Sloan, Sun Apr 8 13:29
          Would Ronelle, Sam, Steve, Sue, Nancy, John, and Kurt like to have another reunion in da Bx next month? (We couldn't reach Kurt last year to arrange his participation.) My thoughts are to meet Nancy... more
        • Re: When testimony becomes tripeMichael 5260 for Anonymous, Sat Apr 7 14:51
          I don't think we have to consider everything about John Trendley. We have his spoken testimony. The testimony is enough. I also don't think trying to make fools out of reputable examiners is... more
          • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Sat Apr 7 19:28
            Let's take a look at what you've written shall we? Testimony is "enough." Okay, so an expert testifying that a forged document Trendley prepared was authentic is what exactly? Testimony? Next I think ... more
            • Re: When testimony becomes tripeMichael 5260 for Anonymous, Sun Apr 8 08:39
              If you believe that forensic document examination is junk science you need to start writing letters about this problem and send them to the following: Interpol Scotland Yard RCMP FBI U.S. Postal... more
              • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Sun Apr 8 22:43
                List cases where two experts representing a legitimate science testify against one another. Ballistics? Serology? Fingerprints? QDE examiners are nothing more than educated "guessers." Its why both... more
                • Re: When testimony becomes tripeMichael 5260, Mon Apr 9 08:05
                  Stop trying to give me assignments. I'm not interested in ballistics, serology, or fingerprints. The focus of our warped discussion is Trendley and the handwriting evidence in the Lindbergh... more
                  • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Tue Apr 10 08:21
                    Of course you don't want to evaluate based on true sciences. Its understandable and I don't blame you. So why not look at court testimony you like so much but this time from two experts testifying on ... more
                • Re: When testimony becomes tripeAnonymous, Sun Apr 8 22:44
                  *doesn't
                  • Real IssuesJack, Mon Apr 9 15:41
                    It seems this Trendly stuff is just another sidebar that doesn't really mean anything. You all who profess an alternative to a one Kidnapper/Hauptmann solution should try to find something of... more
                    • Re: Real IssuesAnonymous, Tue Apr 10 08:30
                      It is a sidebar but an important one. Handwriting experts have been disagreeing with one another ever since the term existed. If someone were to accuse you of forgery don't be surprised if the... more
Click here to receive daily updates