That's all great information but yes, they did testify on opposite sides. Strikes me as stalling but whatever. I'll leave it up to you to do the proper research in order to discover this for yourself.
Now to get back to the point...
You are intimately aware that different QDEs testify in court. There are QDEs for the Prosecution, and there are QDEs for the Defense. In civil matters, there can be a separate QDE for each side. In these cases their testimonies conflict. Yet they are both experts.
I'm not aware of court cases where Albert S. Osborn and Elbridge W. Stein consistently appeared on opposite sides. If you have a list, or partial list, with the names of the court cases I will look... more
Re: When testimony becomes tripe — Anonymous,Sat Apr 7 19:41
You made the claim about Osborn and Stein. You must have done the research beforehand and know the names of the cases if you are making the assertion. Share the information with us. I would like to... more
Yes I made it and yes I have the cases and/or references. Being an expert yourself you should already know, and if you don't shouldn't you be at the ready to research it yourself? You say you want to ... more
You have the cases and/or references? I doubt it. If you did you would have plastered then all over the place to such an extent we would all need a barf bag. I'm supposed to do research that was... more
You "doubt" it. Funny. Barf bag indeed. Project much? Once again, despite all of this fluff and attempts at sounding legit, you once again evade the point: Two experts you like were on opposite... more
Of course I doubt it. You made the claim about Osborn and Stein. Yet you show us nothing. You think it's funny? I don't. "Project much"? Now you move us into the psychiatric realm? What does this... more
You've lost your mind. You came here to bash Trendley unopposed. Sorry to interfere, but whatever you do don't let the facts get into the way. The next thing I know I "hate" Stein and Osborn?... more