Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Joe for Jack
Re: Agree
Sat May 5, 2018 11:49
2607:fea8:1ca0:459:3557:8a0e:367a:2055

I might have missed it Jack, but what was your proof? I have a lot of my own thoughts that tell me the same thing.

  • AgreeJack, Sat May 5 04:53
    I agree w/Joe. While Richard was thinking about it, i.e. had time to write the notes, he was probably devising some form of trickery for his writing. Why wouldn't he? But the basic writing, in spite... more
    • Re: Agree — Joe for Jack, Sat May 5 11:49
      • CAL innocentJack, Sun May 6 22:04
        Well, Joe - I've gone by what Ronelle commented when I posted mine, "why didn't anyone think of this before?" I know you said that if Charles would have known what was in the note he would never have ... more
        • Re: CAL innocentAnonymous, Mon May 7 03:48
          Oops, if CAL would have known what was in the note, I believe you said he would have opened it and then not called the police. Sorry, my FP. If Charles would have known Charlie was dead he could have ... more
          • Re: CAL innocentJoe for Jack, Tue May 8 14:18
            Yes, my point was that if Lindbergh had set this up as a fake kidnapping, and of course known the envelope on the windowsill was part of the staging, he would have opened it right away and not... more
          • Re: CAL innocentAnonymous, Mon May 7 03:49
            Above was from Jack. Maybe I'll be Jack Anonymous.
        • TLCJack, Sun May 6 22:28
          In reality though, all side talk aside, I solved The Lindbergh Crime because I knocked out the biggest obstacle to Hauptmann's doing it alone, and there's nobody else to blame.
Click here to receive daily updates