Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Michael 5260 for The Forum
The invisible QDE
Thu Jun 28, 2018 09:40
24.185.60.218

For a very long time I have asked over and over the name of the handwriting expert that examined the trim board writing in Hauptmann's closet and that concluded it was a forged writing. My last message on this board was June 19 and it is titled "Massive".

Each time I have asked the name of the handwriting expert I receive two types of replies.

1. A "nonresponsive answer" that evades or does not relate to the question asked. A failure to answer the question or evades answering the question.

2. An "ad hominem". A personal attack rather than answering the question. Attacking me rather than my question.

My question has always been a very direct one. There are no subtle nuances attached to the question. It only asks the name of the handwriting expert that examined the trim board writing.

After repeatedly reading nonresponsive answers and ad hominem attacks I can only logically conclude that there never was a handwriting expert that judged the trim board writing a forged writing. There never was such a person. If there had been the name would have been readily provided the first time I asked the question years ago.

I ask all the members of this forum. What reasonable deduction would you conclude about this undisclosed handwriting expert?

Thank you.

    • Re: The invisible QDEsteve for mike, Fri Jun 29 10:39
      my answer is as of now I don't know, but I might have a document or something in my collection that tells me
      • Re: The invisible QDEMichael 5260 for Steve, Sat Jun 30 09:09
        Thank you Steve. This ghost handwriting expert issue is a contemporary one so I don't think you will find anything about it in your collection. I do know the answer and it is an easy answer. I think... more
        • Re: The invisible QDEMichael, Sat Jun 30 10:59
          No Steve you read our exchange below correctly. This is what Script has been doing for years. And each and every time I was stupid enough to engage him he resurfaces years later with the same... more
          • Re: The invisible QDEMichael 5260 for Michael, Sat Jun 30 11:55
            Your position about the name of the handwriting expert that explained to you that Hauptmann's trim board writing was a forged writing is as clear as mud. Just spit the person's name out and this... more
            • Re: The invisible QDEMichael, Sat Jun 30 12:18
              Tue Jun 19, 2018 13:45 Script: I told you years ago the telephone number was not a forgery and you said it was a forgery according to an expert that explained it to you. That is not what I said. Is... more
              • Re: The invisible QDEMichael 5260 for Michael, Sat Jun 30 13:35
                Yes you can say more. You said "explained by me through the one expert who did take a look at it". So, what was the name of the expert "though which" you obtained your information so you could... more
  • Click here to receive daily updates