Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Michael
Re: The invisible QDE
Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:59
2001:558:6027:18:4973:a7f7:cbc9:9777


No Steve you read our exchange below correctly. This is what Script has been doing for years. And each and every time I was stupid enough to engage him he resurfaces years later with the same nonsense which completely ignored our previous interactions. Sometimes I choose to ignore him but in my absence it appears an imaginary exchange takes place at that time. I don't know, while it appears like a tactic, or possibly born from misunderstanding, its hard to ignore that he sounds serious.

Anyway my position was made clear. Any issues are his cross to bear.


  • Re: The invisible QDEMichael 5260 for Steve, Sat Jun 30 09:09
    Thank you Steve. This ghost handwriting expert issue is a contemporary one so I don't think you will find anything about it in your collection. I do know the answer and it is an easy answer. I think... more
    • Re: The invisible QDE — Michael, Sat Jun 30 10:59
      • Re: The invisible QDEMichael 5260 for Michael, Sat Jun 30 11:55
        Your position about the name of the handwriting expert that explained to you that Hauptmann's trim board writing was a forged writing is as clear as mud. Just spit the person's name out and this... more
        • Re: The invisible QDEMichael, Sat Jun 30 12:18
          Tue Jun 19, 2018 13:45 Script: I told you years ago the telephone number was not a forgery and you said it was a forgery according to an expert that explained it to you. That is not what I said. Is... more
          • Re: The invisible QDEMichael 5260 for Michael, Sat Jun 30 13:35
            Yes you can say more. You said "explained by me through the one expert who did take a look at it". So, what was the name of the expert "though which" you obtained your information so you could... more
Click here to receive daily updates