Fake Kidnapping
Tue Jul 24, 2018 00:32

How would you do a fake kidnapping? And what would be the motive. If it's to get rid of Charlie there are lots of easy ways to do it, and legal too.

After all these years of questioning the crime, it's amazing that someone would come up with a question that was asked and never answered on 3/2/32. Yup, one day out.

Where is any evidence? Seems a big question for most of the posts on this site. Remember, any evidence - lets see it.

AS far as the "wiped down" nursery is concerned - if Betty was a credible nurse, she would have wiped it down routinely.

  • Was It A Fake Kidnapping?Joe for Forum, Sun Jul 22 11:02
    Have the major players in this case, those being Charles (presumably the mastermind) and Anne Lindbergh, Betty Gow, Henry Breckinridge, John Condon and possibly the Whateleys, Al Reich and Alexis... more
    • Fake Kidnapping — Jack, Tue Jul 24 00:32
      • Re: Fake KidnappingJoe, Tue Jul 24 07:22
        I have no idea how you'd accomplish a fake kidnapping Jack, especially at that level, and given the cast of characters who obviously would have had to have chosen to flush their good names, family... more
        • faking a kidnappingbob mills for joe and forum, Tue Jul 24 10:21
          Again, Joe, I agree with you that the Eaglet's kidnapping wasn't faked. But to play devil's advocate for a moment, I'd say it was barely possible. If we assume the Eaglet was already dead, then to... more
          • Re: faking a kidnappingJoe for Bob Mills, Tue Jul 24 11:20
            Those are all valid points, Bob. I think the most difficult issue to overcome though, would have been the essential collaboration of the players systematically disposing of a beautiful and very much... more
            • ruling out a faked kidnappingbob mills for joe, Tue Jul 24 13:10
              I think that's especially true for Anne, Joe. Betty Gow? Possibly. Anne? No way. A mother doesn't help a villainous husband cover up the killing of her son, even if it were accidental, then stay... more
              • Re: ruling out a faked kidnappingJoe for Bob Mills, Wed Jul 25 10:42
                Bob, it was far more than the ransom money that convinced the jury Hauptmann was very much involved. The other physical circumstantial evidence against him is inarguable in that regard and remember... more
              • CJjack, Tue Jul 24 16:19
                Except that both Condon and Lindbergh identified Hauptmann as being Cemetery John. Lindbergh certainly understood the gravity of his identification and was not known to be a liar. Lindbergh was in... more
                • COndon's and Lindy's identification of BrunoRichard Sloan, Wed Jul 25 10:18
                  I believe Hauptmann was at least in on the kidnapping, even if he wasn't he actual kidnapper. But you know darn well that a lot of stunts were pulled by the prosecution to convict him, even though I... more
                  • why jafsie identified hauptmannbob mills for richard and forum, Thu Jul 26 10:35
                    Wilentz might well have pressured Jafsie Condon as you suggest, Richard. But for me, the difference between Jafsie's failure to ID Hauptmann at the lineup, and his emphatic ID in court, is one simple ... more
                    • #1Jack, Thu Jul 26 14:21
                      But in spite of being PE#1 for years the police never picked him up or showed any interest in him. He wound up goofing himself up. Condon's I.D. was so general that it fit about anybody. Shouldn't... more
                    • identifying Bruno, for Bob and forumRichard Sloan, Thu Jul 26 11:52
                      I tend to agree with you, Bob that Condon feared reprisal if he identified Hauptmann. However he HAD identify other men, who later turned out to have strong alibis. It prompts me to wonder a.) why... more
                    • Re: why jafsie identified hauptmannJoe for Bob Mills, Thu Jul 26 11:09
                      I believe Condon was truly concerned for his safety within the prospect of having to identify CJ, as the prevalent opinion at that point that there were more participants in the crime than Hauptmann. ... more
                  • Re: COndon's and Lindy's identification of BrunoJoe for Richard, Wed Jul 25 12:39
                    Richard, I don't know about the voice ID by Lindbergh, but I would say his senses were probably on high alert that night. I don't believe Condon had much in the way of doubts but he truly resented... more
                    • more on JFC 's and CAL's ID's of BrunoRichard Sloan, Wed Jul 25 12:56
                      Regardless of being on "high alert," Lindy's hearing was impaired, thanks to the noises of flying in the old planes. He didn't even think he could identify the voice. Foley asked him to try. His... more
                • evidencejack, Tue Jul 24 16:23
                  You bring up evidence - there is absolutely no evidence of Charlie being accidentally or intentionally killed and the kidnapping a cover up. After 85 years of digging, no evidence!
                  • Re: evidenceJoe for Jack, Wed Jul 25 12:42
                    It's been a house of cards for over 85 years. It just keeps getting bigger with fancier window dressing..
    • faked kidnapping scenariosbob mills for joe and forum, Mon Jul 23 12:06
      I don't think the kidnapping was faked either, Joe. But for the benefit of the forum, it might be helpful to enumerate the various theories that have been advanced over the years. Here are three (not ... more
    • Re: Was It A Fake Kidnapping?Michael 5260, Sun Jul 22 12:44
      Well said.
      • Re: Was It A Fake Kidnapping?steve romeo, Mon Jul 23 11:32
        I don't know what you mean by a fake kidnapping if you think all these people were involved with all the evidence against Hauptman then this is bad investigating
        • Re: Was It A Fake Kidnapping?Joe for Steve, Mon Jul 23 12:10
          Hi Steve, I was suggesting to anyone who believes this could have been a fake kidnapping inspired by Charles Lindbergh, that they should consider whether he ever would have done something this crazy, ... more
          • Re: Was It A Fake Kidnapping?steve for joe, Mon Jul 23 12:28
            i tink the Lindbergh did it theory is the dumbest thing I ever heard in this case. theres no real evidence that he was involved. its not worth discussing
            • Re: Was It A Fake Kidnapping?Joe for Steve, Mon Jul 23 14:40
              He flew from New York to Paris in 1927, and saw the world reaction and unwanted publicity that created for himself, and that he had so much difficulty coping with. His life was barely back to normal... more
      • Re: Was It A Fake Kidnapping?Joe, Sun Jul 22 13:54
        Not to mention the cost of the investigation and trial.. what are we talking here.. from March 1, 1932 and well into the late 1930's? Perhaps a hundred million dollars at today's value?
        • Re: Was It A Fake Kidnapping?Michael 5260, Sun Jul 22 17:12
          Yeah Joe. It's very expensive sometimes to capture, prosecute, and defend the guilty.
          • Proof that it Wasn't a Fake KidnappingJack, Fri Aug 10 03:16
            It couldn't have been a fake kidnapping because then Charles would have known what was in the first note, opened it right away, and started not calling the police. Also he wouldn't have protected the ... more
            • Above InformationJack, Fri Aug 10 03:24
              The information in the post above also proves that CAL had nothing to do with the 3/1/32 crime, so lots of investigators are still heading in the wrong direction after all those years.
Click here to receive daily updates