Michael
Re: My research must be flawed
Sat Aug 4, 2018 11:21
2001:558:6027:18:6db1:35f3:150b:93a9


Thanks for the offer but I don't need you to look into it for me since I've already done it for both. I am telling you it occurred, and it contradicts your position. Unlike some of the other internet personalities who claim expertise I don't have agoraphobia. When I tell you about the research I have it most likely came from the NJSP Archives. So while its more comforting to rely on one's imagination, I prefer to do archival research instead.

Are you seriously telling me you don't know of any case where Stein and Osborn were on opposite sides?

So you DO like dirty tricks? Okay, well at least I know where you stand.




  • Re: My research must be flawedMichael 5260, Sat Aug 4 11:00
    I do not care whether or not law enforcement was amused by the Osborns. I do know that a conclusion about a handwriting has to be proven in court. An examiner does this with handwriting exhibits,... more
    • Re: My research must be flawed — Michael, Sat Aug 4 11:21
      • Re: My research must be flawedMichael 5260, Sat Aug 4 15:46
        If you have already looked into it you can answer the questions. So, crank up some of that secret, it seems to be secret, archival information you have and answer the questions. No, I don't know of... more
        • Re: My research must be flawedMichael, Sun Aug 5 09:01
          Of course I could answer them as could many others here on THIS Board. Isn't it amazing that we have a whole group of "Experts" over on the Yahoo site that cannot? Why is that I wonder? That insult... more
          • Re: My research must be flawedMichael 5260, Sun Aug 5 10:44
            Okay. If there are many others on this board, I only need one person, that can answer my two questions I look forward to hearing their forthcoming answers. The questions are: * What was the name and... more
            • Re: My research must be flawedAnonymous, Sun Aug 5 13:46
              As to question number 2: Bert Farrar, QDE, U.S. Treasury Dept. He did believe that Hauptmann wrote the notes, but had a "falling out" with the State Police in 1932. He was subpoenaed to the Hauptmann ... more
              • Re: My research must be flawedMichael, Tue Aug 7 07:33
                Someone has been paying attention. The falling out went further than just in '32. And the use of the subpoena was a tactic employed by the State. That tactic was twofold: They never intended to use... more
Click here to receive daily updates