Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Michael 5260
Re: Looking at the trim board
Mon Oct 1, 2018 11:36
24.185.60.218

We are not discussing the Jonbenet Ramsey Case.

We are not discussing the Angelo LaMarca Case.

We are not discussing the Alfred Dreyfus Case.

We are not discussing the Cadet Johnson Whittaker Case.

We are not discussing the Hitler diaries.

We are not discussing the Winnie Ruth Judd Case.

We are not discussing the Roland B. Molineux Case.

We are not discussing the Howard Hughes Case.

We are discussing the address and telephone number written on the trim board in Bruno Richard Hauptmann' closet. Nothing else. Period.

Dragging in a different handwriting case that has nothing whatsoever to do with the trim board writing is pure obfuscation. There is no other definition for it.

You must have one hell of a naked eye to be able to see if a writing is forged or not. Do you know what the classic symptoms of a forgery are? Do you know what the indications of genuineness are?

By the way. Since you have been swimming in police/BI/PI reports what are the qualifications of the handwriting seer Edward Oehler? This should be a simple question. Or is it?

At the time I was traveling back and forth to the archives and doing my handwriting examinations there were only two people that had examined the trim board writing. A person from out west that was never seen or heard from again and me. That's it. Only two people. You like facts don't you? You have a big one with this fact and it is provable.

I'm glad you didn't need all the equipment I listed to arrive at a reasoned judgment, based on collected data, about the trim board writing. If I had your trained eye I could have saved myself thousands of dollars.

Of course you are beating a dead horse. The reason for it is that you are closed minded, you do not like forensic evidence, and you scoff at scientific method. Fortunately we do not live in the Dark Ages.

Your psychological skills also astound me. You "know" that I already had my mind made up before I went to the archives? I burned up gasoline and time over and over, back and forth, and I had my mind made up. If that were true I would not have had to leave my house at all. Why go to the archives? I could just sit back and claim something is forged, when it really isn't, or claim something is genuine, when it really isn't. It's the tabloid journalist approach. It seems to work quite well for them.

  • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael , Mon Oct 1 09:43
    I am quite certain most every "expert" utilize this same equipment you mentioned above, yet, they still come down on separate sides of questioned documents often. Didn't the "experts" in the Ramsey... more
    • Re: Looking at the trim board — Michael 5260, Mon Oct 1 11:36
      • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael, Mon Oct 1 12:54
        Okay, so lets examine the important part of your post: Of course you are beating a dead horse. The reason for it is that you are closed minded, you do not like forensic evidence, and you scoff at... more
        • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Mon Oct 1 14:58
          Why MUST I agree with the examiners that opined that Patsy Ramsey wrote the ransom note, or, why MUST I agree with the examiners that said she did not write the ransom note. I haven't examined the... more
          • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael, Tue Oct 2 08:00
            Just a little reminder concerning what you accused me of: The reason for it is that you are closed minded, you do not like forensic evidence, and you scoff at scientific method. So if what you write... more
            • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Tue Oct 2 13:11
              Are you comprehending what I write? I'm starting to have some doubts. What did I say about the Ramsey case? I don't have any opinion about the Patsy Ramsey handwriting. How could I have one when I... more
              • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael , Tue Oct 2 15:17
                Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in! You are all over the place and it would take me about an hour to counter what you've written and I just don't have the time. I do like discussing... more
                • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Tue Oct 2 21:06
                  I see you have completely avoided the three handwriting reports I mentioned. Your response to them is avoidance? Funny, at the time Dr. Baier gave his opinion you were in nirvana. I'm talking about... more
                  • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael, Wed Oct 3 08:23
                    By the way... If this is the guy the QDE says wrote those notes that should be YOUR "cup of tea" since a its coming from a fellow "expert." Remember, I'm the guy who doesn't believe its a real... more
                    • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Wed Oct 3 10:38
                      The person that made the claim about Thomas Wolfe is a "woman" not a "man" or as you say a "guy." I guess you didn't know this because it didn't have a "footnote" with it and it wasn't found in the... more
                  • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael, Wed Oct 3 08:21
                    Not going to work Script. I am not going to be consumed by a wild goose chase based upon your misrepresentation of what you think I believe or believed. You want to know what that is you read both... more
                    • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Wed Oct 3 10:52
                      You have qualms about being consumed by a wild goose chase? You have been on one for 18 years. You have this idea that a "footnote" is some kind of powerful weapon of truth. It isn't. All a footnote... more
            • Re: Looking at the trim boardsteve romeo, Tue Oct 2 09:52
              in my experience with this case don't compare this case with any other
Click here to receive daily updates