Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Michael
Re: Looking at the trim board
Mon Oct 1, 2018 12:54
2001:558:6027:18:e5f8:3aff:471f:669

Okay, so lets examine the important part of your post:

Of course you are beating a dead horse. The reason for it is that you are closed minded, you do not like forensic evidence, and you scoff at scientific method. Fortunately we do not live in the Dark Ages.

So by your very own argument above, we ARE talking about QDE are we not? Forensic Evidence. Okay so we are. Having said that then you MUST agree with your counterparts who claim Patsy Ramsey wrote the Ransom Note in that case - right? They used all of the same equipment, have all of the same education & expertise concerning this science. If not, then you agree with those "experts" who say she did not?

So you see, it is important to establish the reliability of anything that will be used to "prove" something. Isn't it?

Like I've always said...there is something to it. But there should always be other evidence to compliment or refute. There are just too many situation which prove it is not as reliable as we all wish it was. And if it was there would NEVER be two "experts" on either side of a questioned document - ever.

I understand why you are being defensive and believe me when I say I don't hold it against you. And if I was "closed minded" like you erroneously characterized me, I would have never written that chapter. Why? Because I went into my research thinking Hauptmann either wrote all - or none of it. What I learned was something completely new as a result of the actual research.

Anyway enough is enough. I hate to see you upset like this.




  • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Mon Oct 1 11:36
    We are not discussing the Jonbenet Ramsey Case. We are not discussing the Angelo LaMarca Case. We are not discussing the Alfred Dreyfus Case. We are not discussing the Cadet Johnson Whittaker Case.... more
    • Re: Looking at the trim board — Michael, Mon Oct 1 12:54
      • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Mon Oct 1 14:58
        Why MUST I agree with the examiners that opined that Patsy Ramsey wrote the ransom note, or, why MUST I agree with the examiners that said she did not write the ransom note. I haven't examined the... more
        • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael, Tue Oct 2 08:00
          Just a little reminder concerning what you accused me of: The reason for it is that you are closed minded, you do not like forensic evidence, and you scoff at scientific method. So if what you write... more
          • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Tue Oct 2 13:11
            Are you comprehending what I write? I'm starting to have some doubts. What did I say about the Ramsey case? I don't have any opinion about the Patsy Ramsey handwriting. How could I have one when I... more
            • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael , Tue Oct 2 15:17
              Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in! You are all over the place and it would take me about an hour to counter what you've written and I just don't have the time. I do like discussing... more
              • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Tue Oct 2 21:06
                I see you have completely avoided the three handwriting reports I mentioned. Your response to them is avoidance? Funny, at the time Dr. Baier gave his opinion you were in nirvana. I'm talking about... more
                • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael, Wed Oct 3 08:23
                  By the way... If this is the guy the QDE says wrote those notes that should be YOUR "cup of tea" since a its coming from a fellow "expert." Remember, I'm the guy who doesn't believe its a real... more
                  • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Wed Oct 3 10:38
                    The person that made the claim about Thomas Wolfe is a "woman" not a "man" or as you say a "guy." I guess you didn't know this because it didn't have a "footnote" with it and it wasn't found in the... more
                    • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael, Wed Oct 3 11:29
                      So a QDE can be either a man or a woman. But they are only "good" ones if they conclude as you do. Got it. I see you agree with Gideon Epstein. Why? Because he believes Hauptmann wrote the notes. So... more
                • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael, Wed Oct 3 08:21
                  Not going to work Script. I am not going to be consumed by a wild goose chase based upon your misrepresentation of what you think I believe or believed. You want to know what that is you read both... more
                  • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael 5260, Wed Oct 3 10:52
                    You have qualms about being consumed by a wild goose chase? You have been on one for 18 years. You have this idea that a "footnote" is some kind of powerful weapon of truth. It isn't. All a footnote... more
                    • Re: Looking at the trim boardMichael, Wed Oct 3 10:58
                      You have qualms about being consumed by a wild goose chase? You have been on one for 18 years. And you would know this how exactly? I think it would require actual research, but then again, that's a... more
          • Re: Looking at the trim boardsteve romeo, Tue Oct 2 09:52
            in my experience with this case don't compare this case with any other
Click here to receive daily updates