bob mills for ralph jones
facts and theories
Sun Dec 2, 2018 05:06

I'll never understand how an educated man like you, Mr. Jones, could possibly feel a need to describe someone with whom he disagrees as "scum of the earth." Maybe your vitriol simply reflects the current tone of all debate in the body politic.

Let me comment on Occam's Razor. The first chapter of my book, "Conscience of a Conspiracy Theorist," (Algora Publishing, 2011) is titled, "It's Dangerous to Shave with Occam's Razor." The chapter applies its argument, that among varying theories, the simplest is the most likely to be accurate, to the Kennedy assassination and to the collapse on 9/11/01 of Building #7 later that day.

The book didn't apply Occam's Razor to the Lindbergh Kidnapping Case. But I chose to say, "It's dangerous to shave with Occam's Razor" because in cases where the government wants the public to believe the "official account" of a controversial case, said government is capable AND WILLING to present evidence in a misleading or even fraudulent manner. We now know that Lee Harvey Oswald could not possibly have acted alone, and that Building #7 was deliberately demolished by explosives. Pertaining to the LKC, we know that certain evidence that the jury relied on was phony...Condon's phone number written on the wall at Hauptmann's apartment, and the thumb guard found in the driveway after that area had benn repeatedly searched.

You refer to "facts" without testing those facts for the very real possibility that they represented planted evidence. Just as the government wanted everyone to think Oswald was a lone assassin, and wanted them to accept the Kean-Hamilton Commission as the final word about 9/11, there were vested interests in New Jersey and New York that wanted Hauptmann tried as a lone kidnapper, so the case could be finally closed after years of media criticism of the police. You claim he acted alone, but the facts suggests he was in cahoots with others.

  • You Are Deeply StupidRalph Jones, Sat Dec 1 02:11
    Conspiracy theories alone work off an ignorant premise, that as long as we can make assumptions with no evidence, we can pretty much deny anything that has ever happened. First, this joke of a... more
    • Ralph Jones you ate deeply stupidTania Bowman, Thu Dec 13 02:41
      Seems to me that you are the deeply stupid one. Leave Ronelle alone, she's 😎. Just about everyone here knows that I believe Hal Olson was Charlie Jr. So Hauptman couldn't have murdered... more
    • you should be ashamed of yourselfronelle to jones, Wed Dec 5 07:32
      You used my website to study this case and you aren't ashamed to be calling me "scum" and "moron." You don't have the decency to thank me for giving you free access to sources I spent a lot of time... more
    • You ARE NOT Deeply StupidSue for Ralph Jones, Sun Dec 2 13:43
      You are not deeply stupid, and neither is Ronelle. And if you were in a face-to-face situation discussing your thoughts and feeling, I believe you would be HIGHLY ARTICULATE as you've demonstrated in ... more
      • Re: You ARE NOT Deeply StupidMichael For Sue, Mon Dec 3 07:24
        Interesting to see how you turned an ugly attack against our friend Ronelle into something about you. Unbelievable!!!
        • About YouSue for Michael Melsky, Mon Dec 3 19:58

          • Re: About YouMichael For Sue, Tue Dec 4 08:03
            Exactly. Your bizarre, unhinged, and irrational post was about YOU. Someone maligns Ronelle and here is your chance to defend a loyal and great friend but you choose instead to use it as a way to... more
            • You Make WrongSue for Michael, Tue Dec 4 13:01
              You better watch using words like bizarre, unhinged and irrational about me, Michael. You certainly weren't using those words against me when I was contributing to your board(s) over the years! And... more
              • Re: You Make WrongMichael, Tue Dec 4 14:06
                I don't even know where to respond to this but I can say this: If you were actually right I would have defended you no matter who the offender was. But I cannot pretend you were correct about... more
            • civil discoursebob mills for entire forum, Tue Dec 4 10:34
              This forum is turning into a first cousin of Breitbart or RawStory. Can't we discuss historical controversies without attacking one another? Just because certain politicians (no names, please) don't... more
              • For Bob Millsjdb, Sun Dec 9 05:12
                Thank you, Bob Mills. If people don't mind their manners here this forum is going to turn into an Internet nightmare version of the old Morton Downey, Jr. show. It's sort of half-way there already,... more
                • the decline of civilitybob mills for john b., Mon Dec 10 10:19
                  Amen, John. Ronelle started the forum, so any restrictions or punishments for bad manners should originate with her. There have always been intellectuals who look down their noses at those they... more
                  • Bad Mannersjdb, Tue Dec 11 03:17
                    Hi Bob, Bad manners have been on the rise in recent years, especially on the Internet and in social media. This is the downside of being able to, in effect, speak to others without having to see... more
    • Re: You Are Deeply StupidMichael, Sun Dec 2 08:54
      I won't accuse you of being stupid - just ignorant. Both of Fisher's book are littered with mistakes so they aren't the Bible you think they are. I mean c'mon - the guy invented conversations! From... more
      • Re: You Are Deeply Stupidsteve for mike, Mon Dec 3 12:02
        first off sue and myself are good friends with ronnelle met many times on the Bronx tour. second many authors have used ronnelles board as a springboard to learn the case in the beginning of their... more
        • Re: You Are Deeply StupidMichael, Tue Dec 4 08:15
          I get it Steve. Believe me I get it. Now as it pertains to Fisher... No book is perfect and I am not saying he got everything wrong. I've told everyone I know to read them but caution about the... more
    • facts and theories — bob mills for ralph jones, Sun Dec 2 05:06
      • Re: facts and theoriessteve for bob mills, Mon Dec 3 12:05
        im not going to waste my time with this asshole. ronelle is not the scum of the earth I question this guys work skills and job
Click here to receive daily updates