Joe for Michael 5260
Re: The sound of crickets.
Fri Jan 4, 2019 13:18

It's still an unusual situation the way I see it Michael, because I can't imagine any QDE who hasn't been living under a rock to not understand that it was Hauptmann who wrote each and every ransom note in what is arguably the most notable questioned document case in history. So I'm left wondering firstly, on what basis Kennedy included such a questionable claim in his book, and secondly, why Gus Lesnevich simply can't provide some insight here, as to how he came to his conclusion, if Kennedy's claim is indeed accurate.

  • Re: The sound of crickets.Michael 5260 for Joe, Wed Jan 2 12:11
    We only have Gus Lesnevich's professional opinion in the back of Kennedy's book. His detailed examination "findings" were not explained. Robert Bryan has the complete written report and the standards ... more
    • Re: The sound of crickets. — Joe for Michael 5260, Fri Jan 4 13:18
      • Re: The sound of crickets.Michael 5260 for Joe, Wed Jan 9 12:37
        I'm just as perplexed about it as you are Joe. This may be an itch we will never get to scratch. Kennedy also included Gunter Haas' contrary handwriting opinion in his book. Haas was a graphologist.... more
Click here to receive daily updates