It's still an unusual situation the way I see it Michael, because I can't imagine any QDE who hasn't been living under a rock to not understand that it was Hauptmann who wrote each and every ransom note in what is arguably the most notable questioned document case in history. So I'm left wondering firstly, on what basis Kennedy included such a questionable claim in his book, and secondly, why Gus Lesnevich simply can't provide some insight here, as to how he came to his conclusion, if Kennedy's claim is indeed accurate.