Joe
Re: Lt. Joe Kenda
Thu Apr 4, 2019 13:09
207.35.3.114

Michael, of course anyone with the type of credentials both you and I would like to see put forth a proper and thoroughly unbiased investigation of the LKC, would by necessity be required to, and want to examine every aspect of the case that presented itself. I don't believe that's ever been a point of dispute here.

As an aside, if the last few televised specials on this case are any indication, it's obvious that no one of Kenda's caliber has yet agreed to involve himself accordingly and the resultant messages have fallen well short.

  • Re: Lt. Joe KendaMichael, Thu Apr 4 10:10
    Professionals such as Kenda do not limit themselves in this way Joe. They always consider the parents and/or a family members concerning a child abduction. Ultimately they go where the facts lead... more
    • Re: Lt. Joe Kenda — Joe, Thu Apr 4 13:09
      • Re: Lt. Joe KendaMichael, Thu Apr 4 13:52
        I haven't seen any televised specials lately. Most are only an hour long so from my perspective that can't even scratch the surface. So you, me, and everyone else who study the case will all want to... more
        • Re: Lt. Joe KendaJoe, Mon Apr 8 09:17
          Michael, you're incorrect when you state I don't want anyone to consider Lindbergh's involvement in the LKC. I did exactly that many years ago, and I've seen absolutely nothing of a conclusive nature ... more
          • Re: Lt. Joe KendaMichael, Mon Apr 8 12:14
            You may have Joe but perhaps others have not. And if not wouldn't it be a good idea for them to study every angle in order to do as you did? You see, they might conclude something different. Or they... more
Click here to receive daily updates