APFN9/11 - Hawks CAFE on NIST analysis of WTC#7 collapseFri Aug 22, 2008 10:5718.104.22.168David Hawkins email@example.com
9/11 - Hawks CAFE on NIST analysis of WTC#7 collapse
Suggests demolition orders from Blackstone (owner WTC#7) mortgage, KPMG escrow for lenders using
AMEC-Citigroup and fake diesel project to camouflage arson and destruction evidence of ongoing
WTC Technical Information Repository, Attn: Stephen Cauffman,
NIST, 100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8611, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899-8610.
[Original e-mailed to Dr. Cauffman, August 22, 2008]
Dear Dr. Cauffman:
Re excerpts in notes below, we have comments on the NIST analysis of the WTC#7 collapse.
Our research suggests the building was demolished at 5:20 pm on 9/11 on orders from the Blackstone
Group (owner of the WTC#7) mortgage and KPMG the allegedly bogus escrow for syndicated lenders
who used AMEC-Citigroup as prime contractor and a fake diesel-system project to camouflage arson and
sabotage of the building and the destruction of evidence of ongoing securities frauds.
KPMG had used its insider escrow position to double up insurance on the WTC#7 mortgage so that its
demolition would generate an estimated $400 million in profits shared with the demolition team and
Blackstone private equity investors.
We notice that the NIST analysis excludes what could not have explained anyway the observed
characteristics of the demolition i.e. no percussive sound effects heard therefore not due to explosives, not
enough heat from fires fed by the fuel supply tanks therefore not due to fires fed by the fuel supply tanks
and not enough structural impact therefore not due to damage from the falling
debris of WTC 1.
What you did not address is the fact that AMEC was conducting sabotage vulnerability testing on 9/11 in all
the WTC buildings using ultra high temperature accelerants developed by Molten Metal Technology
sponsored by Al Gore and Maurice Strong and weaponized by Lockheed Martin.
Kindly ask your NIST scientists to examine the hypothesis that the central columns were melted or even
vaporized with UHTA reaching temperatures up to 5,800 degrees Fahrenheit consistent with the use of
solid propellant rocket fuel in the elevator shafts (No percussion heard, pools of molten-steel found and
KPMG-AMEC spoliated evidence of escrow and mortgage and insurance fraud.
Field McConnell and David Hawkins
Forensic Economists at Hawks CAFE
'NIST welcomes comments on the draft report and recommendations —available online at
http://wtc.nist.gov—received by noon Eastern Daylight Time on Sept.15, 2008. Comments (instructions
for submission are available at http://wtc.nist.gov) maybe submitted via: e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org; fax to
(301) 869-6275; or surface mail to WTC Technical Information Repository, Attn: Stephen Cauffman,
NIST, 100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8611, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899-8610.'
'Diagram 1—Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79
was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage
to floors around Column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 44 and 79, and cascading floor failures.
[Download high-res version] The investigation team considered the possibility of other factors playing a role
in the collapse of WTC 7, including the possible use of explosives, fires fed by the fuel supply tanks in and
under the building, and damage from the falling debris of WTC 1. The team said that the smallest blast
event capable of crippling the critical column would have produced a “sound level of 130 to 140 decibels at
a distance of half a mile,” yet no noise this loud was reported by witnesses or recorded on videos. As for
fuel fires, the team found that they could not have been sustained long enough, could not have generated
sufficient heat to fail a critical column, and/or would have produced “large amounts of visible smoke” from
Floors 5 and 6, which was not observed. Finally, the report notes that “while debris impact from the
collapse of WTC 1 initiated fires in WTC 7, the resulting structural damage had little effect in causing the
collapse of WTC 7.”
Field McConnell email@example.com and David Hawkins firstname.lastname@example.org are forensic economists at Hawks CAFE. They are developing http://www.usdoj.gr/rescue08/ (RESCUE' 08) as a U.S. vice-presidential election campign to counter murder-for-hire crimes, mortgage & tax-shelter frauds, carbon taxes and climate-change racketeering. To signal support, please incorporate logo above, or at http://www.usdoj.gr/co2/ , in the signature of your e-mails to either Field or David.
John Edwards Confronted About 911 and WTC7
SEE 9/11 MASTER VIDEO LIST / LINKS:
- COLLAPSED WORLD TRADE CENTER BLDG. 7 CONSPIRACY APFN, Fri Aug 22 12:30-------- Original Message -------- Subject: WTC CONSPIRACY ANSWERS Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:14:10 -0400 From: REAL NEWS email@example.com To: APFN@apfn.org COLLAPSED WORLD TRADE CENTER BLDG. 7... more
- WTC7 mjhnow, Fri Aug 22 15:54Just more government BS. I won't even comment on it. Anyone with eyes can see it was brought down by controlled demolition. Perfect job I must admit.
- America threatens nuclear disarmament Daniel E. Moore, Fri Aug 22 11:41My fellow countrymen, For those who are committed to peace and eventually a world without nuclear weapons I must inform you that the decision to install a missile defense shield in Eastern Europe... more