Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
willpwilson 908
Fri Feb 12, 2016 16:35

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR ALTERING OR DESTROYING RADIOACTIVITY - February 11, 2016 The reasoning, the remedy, the architecture, and the means for immediately implementing the development for our beginning a Plasma Water Nuclear Decontamination technology. Now.

Thereof, Is in part the following information is based also on my having worked with many of the wold's leading scientific community and including world leading physicists in this area explained below and the brilliant work of Michael Wells Mandeville, Frank Stasny, Gary Hawkins and myself, (Dr.) (Wil) Will P. Wilson.

Thus, this in part what is as well also explained below and that this report is fully supported by the following copy of an excerpt of a US Patent that was filed in 1993, that lasted only one day on file in the US Patent office before being black boxed.

These (The following.) discoveries do verify that Plasma and in specific and in reference to the meaning of the key discoveries in the areas of Plasma Water Technologies like that of the work of the renown Heavy Water Physicist Dr. Yull Brown the discoverer of Browns Gas and or thereof, Hydroxy Gas, whom I had worked with until his tragic passing in 1999.

(Not unlike that of what the great inventor named Paul Pantone who has passed away this last month as Paul Pantone appeared many times on the AllDayLive TV programs - )

Now that these technologies are in extreme urgency for the immediate implementation of these technological means of purifying our water and our agriculture irrigation with water that is free of all nuclear contaminates.

Thus as well, due to the massive Nuclear Contamination of the Pacific Ocean and now the entire northern hemisphere due to the Fukushima Nuclear Contamination that is now proliferating the entire planet.

And, in consideration of the more then fifteen thousand other nuclear contamination circumstances that are also now occurring worldwide.

And, including the now occurring methane nuclear toxic cloud coming up from underneath the entire Los Angeles region due to a series of un news released events in the past of nuclear rod melt downs that occurred many decades ago in the Los Angeles area and Southern California areas. .

The Fukushima Worldwide Nuclear Contamination has now permanently killed more then a thousand animal and plant species in and around the entire Pacific Ocean.

The number of species death count is not yet begun to be reported by the main stream media and that there are literally many more thousands of unreported species dies off that are not even known yet. -

This technology will also reveal that gold and silver can be harvested by the many pounds a month using ion to elemental crystal recovery in an area that is still considered to be classified but who cares when the entire planet is now in a death spiral anyway.

GEET Pantone Browns Gas - - -
nuclear chemistry Michael Wells Mandeville -

George Wiseman lives in the eastern part of Washington State.
Advanced transmutation processes and their application for the decontamination of radioactive nuclear wastes A. Michrowski President, Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Inc.
Results 1 - 10 of about 104,000 for Browns Gas nuclear waste.
Vis a vis, here is the information and the URL:

willpwilson 908 Browns Gas & GEET Plasma Technology Destroy Nuclear Material Fri Jun 26, 2015 -;article=154646; -





May 3, 1994

A Report Of Findings

These experiments were undertaken to verify the "Keller Catalytic Process" and the "Barker Effect". They prove that radioactivity can be changed or eliminated at will by electrical or chemical means, opening the door to atomic chemistry.

by Michael Wells Mandeville with assistance from Frank Stasny, Gary Hawkins, & Wil Wilson


The principal investigator undertook a series of experiments to test the "Barker effect" and the "Keller Catalytic Process" in changing the rate of radioactive decay of heavy elements (elements heavier than lead, such as radium, thorium, or uranium, all of which are radioactive). Barker claims that subjecting radioactive materials to high electrostatic potentials (50,000 volts to 500,000 volts) can increase or decrease the rate of radioactive decay, with short exposures of the high voltage capable of inducing erratic decay rates which slowly return to normal over a period of weeks. Keller claims that subjecting radioactive materials to the high heat and fusing reaction of a chemical process (Keller Catalytic Process) can eliminate the radioactivity completely.

An experiment conducted on October, 30 1993 by Jack Keller, using his "Keller Catalytic Process", showed a complete elimination of radioactivity in a sample of NORM (Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material) containing radium. Subsequent experiments were conducted separately and independently by the principal investigator in five series over a period of three months, December 1993 to March 1994. One series, CONTROLS C1-C14, constitute readings and manipulations of control samples of various formulations of radium in "NORM" (naturally occurring radioactive material). The other four series of experiments start with crude efforts which gradually become more refined and more decisive in demonstrating that the radioactive decay rate of radium in NORM can be altered at will by certain electromagnetic and chemical methods.

These results challenge prevailing opinions of scientists about the nature of radioactivity, which many physicists and chemists believe is immutable in nature, unless subjected to high energy nuclear bombardment (as in nuclear reactors, cyclotrons, atomic weapons, or suns).


In the simplest terms, the finding of these experiments is that the rate of radioactive decay, at least in radium, can be altered by electro/thermal chemical reactions or by high potentials of RF (electromagnetic radio frequency energy). Essentially, I have found that the claims of both inventors are substantially correct. Many of my experimental samples show clear, consistent patterns of major changes or diminuation of their radioactivity, which proves to me the validity of both the Barker effect and the Keller Catalytic Process (KCP), at least in general terms.

The major specific findings of these experiments are:

a) Fusing the radium into slag through a chemical reaction (using the specifications of the Keller Catalytic Process) has a clear effect. One sample which we monitored in November of 1993, fired by the inventor, showed a clear decay of all radioactivity to zero within about 72 hours. Other samples, which I fired and monitored myself, independently of the inventor and without his skill at obtaining a complete reaction, showed a remarkable decline in their radioactivity, by 50% to 70% (even though the reactions were amateurishly done without the requisite skill in making the material fuse thoroughly and completely) with a trend which shows some increase in the radioactivity one month after treatment.

b) Stimulating radium with the spark end of a large Tesla coil delivering more that 100,000 volts at low radio frequencies (most likely 50 kilocycles to 25 megacycles) for 30 minutes, while heated to 1400 degrees F, generates a clear effect. First, the rate of radioactivity decreases by as much as 50% over a period of time (a few days) and then it steadily increases over a period of about four weeks until it returns to as much as 75% of its original reading.

c) Heat up to 1400 degree F, in and of itself, seems to have no effect on the rate of radioactive decay of radium. We rather suspected that to begin with, since the high heats involved in nuclear reactors would have probably created results which the nuclear power industry would have detected long ago.

d) Stimulating radium with a Tesla Coil as in (a) above, but without heating the sample, creates a highly noticeable effect. First, the samples show an increase in radioactivity in their second reading (two of them showing greater than a 50% increase), which then decreases during a period of about seven weeks to come close to their original reading. This strange effect "parallels" the "Barker effect".

e) Strong magnetic impulses have little effect in changing the rate of radioactive decay.

f) Simply stimulating radium (in NORM) with a high voltage (12,000 volts AC from a neon sign transformer) seems to create a very strange effect, but I believe the measured effect (a sinusoidal wave of increased then decreased radioactivity) could very well be an "artifact", composed of purely random variations in the art of measuring the sample through time. This sample shows the difficulty of taking valid measurement.

g) The trends in the results are consistent for the types of experiments and among the multiple treatments which were done in each type, although variations in the sample compositions created quantitative differences in the results.

h) Great care was taken to insure that the radioactivity was not blowing off into the atmosphere or was being masked by some other material. The radioactive element did not "disappear", it was altered.

i) The Keller Catalytic Process clearly provides the strongest effect in the permanent elimination of radioactivity. It provides a clearly defined technology pathway, the exploration and development of which should be undertaken in a serious effort to solve the problem of disposing of radioactive waste.

The magnitude and clarity of these effects can be easily seen in the simple graphs with accompany this report. The expected error deviation of 4%. The standard allowance of error is 10%. The fusion fire experiments may have error deviations of 16% Any deviation (change in the graph line) greater than 20% in these graphs should be considered a significant indicator of the ability to alter the radioactivity of a sample.

Table 1: First Keller Sample, the result of the experiment conducted by Jack Keller in October, 1993 and monitored by Frank Stasny. This graph shows a typical decay rate for a radioactive element (radium) which has been treated by the Keller Catalytic Process.

Table 2: Third Round Fusion Fire, the results of four fusion experiments conducted by MW Mandeville on March 2, 1994. This graph shows a semi-successful application of the Keller Catalytic Process, achieving an average reduction in the radioactivity of radium in five samples from a net average CPM of 1395 to 525, a reduction of 62%.

Table 3: Third Round Tesla Treatment, the results of four Tesla/Kiln experiments conducted by MW Mandeville on March 2, 1994. This graph shows the result of simultaneously exposing four samples of radium in various compositions to over 100,000 volts RF from a Tesla coil for 30 minutes while heating the samples to about 1400 degrees F in a small ceramic kiln. The samples tend to show a 35% to 50% decrease in their net radioactivity two days after treatment, which then tends to recover to about 70%-90% of their pre-treatment readings over the course of a month.

Table 4: First Miniature Fusion, the results of a first effort to replicate the Keller Catalytic Process conducted February 8, 1994 by MW Mandeville. The graph shows post-treatment readings only, which gyrate widely, showing a first post-treatment reading about 35%-50% below the their comparable controls, then one sample (E208-1) recovers to what it was originally (inferred) while another (E208-4) gyrates widely (the split sample).

Table 5: Second Round Tesla Experiments, the results of two experiments using a Tesla coil to stimulate NORM with more than 100,000 volts of low RF energy, fed directly through the sample on the top end of the coil, and the result of one experiment where the coil feed wire had burned out inside of a kiln, resulting in no stimulation of the sample. The graph shows post-treatment readings only, which show a clear, strong wave-like response in the two successful experiments over a period of about seven weeks, first increasing, then decreasing. The graph also shows very little deviation (all within the allowance for average deviation) for the unsuccessful treatment (E204-2).

Table 6: Second Round Voltage Experiments, the results of two experiments, one using a neon transformer, 12,000 volts AC and the other using 50,000 volts DC to stimulate the NORM. All readings are post-treatment. The graph shows a pattern of what appears could be a sinusoidal wave in response to the neon transformer. The graph also shows, over a seven week period, a near doubling of the radioactivity of the NORM stimulated for one hour with 50,000 volts DC.

Table 7: Second Round Magnetic Experiments, the results of two experiments using a strong magnetic impulse of a few milliseconds on the NORM. All readings are post-treatment. The graph decisively shows a NULL result, despite the use of enough magnetic energy to cause ferromagnetic metal objects to shrink (compression) in size by 50% or more.

These findings should provide experimentalists and researchers with enough grounds to warrant an open mind and some simple experimentation aimed at exploring how to build on these discoveries. Small laboratories practically anywhere in the world can replicate these experiments and go considerably beyond them, cheaply but with far greater elegance than I was able to achieve with my limited time and even more limited resources.


The inventor, Jack Keller, claims to have discovered a "catalytic" chemical method for "neutralizing" (i.e. destroying) radioactivity. In principle, using the Keller Catalytic Process (KCP) all radioactive isotopes can be "restructured" into non-radioactive elements within a few days. If true, this discovery is as important as Newton's "gravity" and Einstein's "relativity". The discovery has astounding implications and potential applications.

Although I cannot directly or definitively answer the theoretical questions of why it is possible to alter or eliminate radioactivity, I know that these experiments demonstrate clearly and reasonably that it does occur. This creates implications of exceptional importance to both science and industry, the most important of which is that the Keller Catalytic Process, or some successor, may help humankind eliminate its worst environmental problem, the huge inventories of radioactive waste which are slowly contaminating their surroundings and sooner or later will create catastrophic problems.


The easy simplicity by which I was able to demonstrate, using variations of two different inventors, that the rate of radioactive decay is not a stable, universal constant which is independent of environmental conditions, has a lot of rippling consequences for physics, chemistry, geology, archeology, history and so on. Many conditions which duplicate the electro/chemical techniques of these experiments can be easily hypothesized in nature. Contact - Michael Wells Mandeville - HCOI Box 890A, Black Canyon City, AZ 85324 - fone: 623-374-9585 or email: Copyright 1995-1999, MetaSyn Media, all rights reserved; may be quoted at will but only with attribution Last updated March 10, 1997

    • Destroying radioactivityMichael Treis, Sun Mar 20 02:53
      The man to talk to about destroying radioactivity is Dr.Thomas E. Bearden Phd. One of his specialties.
    • INTEL Scrambling Posted News Reports On - Message News Board - on February 11, 2016 - by (Dr.) Will P. Wilson (... more
  • Click here to receive daily updates