Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Why Won't the Post Name CIA Counterterrorism Chief Michael D
Sun Jun 4, 2017 03:47

Why Won't the Post Name CIA Counterterrorism Chief Michael D'Andrea?

John Cook
03/26/15 02:18PM
Filed to: SECRETS
The Washington Post reported this morning that, pursuant to CIA Director John Brennan's vaunted re-organization plans, the chief of the agency's counterterrorism center has been unceremoniously reassigned. The newspaper declined to report this name, however: Michael D'Andrea.

CIA official who directed hunt for bin Laden is being removed from post

He was the basis for a character known as “The Wolf” in the movie “Zero Dark Thirty.”

The Post story, by Greg Miller, includes a lot of detail about D'Andrea. In fact, it's the second story Miller has written exploring—perhaps constructing—D'Andrea's complicated and irascible persona (the other was a profile that appeared in March 2012). Here's what we have learned about D'Andrea from Miller's reporting:

• He is a convert to Islam.

• He "directed the hunt for Osama bin Laden."

• He was the "driving force of the Obama administration's embrace of targeted killing as a centerpiece of its counterterrorism efforts."

• He will be among the "first to face blame if there is another attack on U.S. soil."

• He manages "thousands of employees."

• He chain-smokes cigarettes.

• He spends "countless hours on a treadmill."

• He has a hideaway bed in his office.

• He can be "profane and brutal toward subordinates."

• He was the basis for a character known as "The Wolf" (pictured above) in Zero Dark Thirty.

• He is regarded by one former CIA director as "one of the finest intelligence officers of his generation."

• When a co-worker once attempted to give him a cartoon sketch of himself as a gift, he "crumpled it up and threw it away...saying, 'I don't like depictions of myself.'"

• He has been called "the undertaker."

That's a lot of data—a compelling portrait, even—about a man who occupies a senior role in the CIA, who is accountable for the disposition of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars, who is charged with protecting American citizens from attack, and who is responsible for hundreds of deaths abroad. The one data point that is missing, however, is that name. Michael D'Andrea.

Because he remains undercover, The Washington Post has agreed to withhold his full name. He has been publicly identified in the past by both his actual first name, Mike, as well as that of his CIA-created identity, Roger.

A CIA spokesman asserted to Gawker that the identity of the outgoing director of the counterterrorism center is indeed classified. But that doesn't make it a secret.
D'Andrea's name and affiliation have been on the internet for almost a year, and the ACLU's Chris Soghoian and others have been circulating it on Twitter today. Gawker has independently confirmed D'Andrea's identity.

Christopher Soghoian @csoghoian
WaPo withholds full name of retiring CIA terrorism official, Michael D’Andrea, architect of drone signature strikes.
8:40 AM - 26 Mar 2015
31 31 Retweets 13 13 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
D'Andrea's predecessor at the counterterrorism center was also treated as an undercover operative, but the position has historically been occupied by real, named senior government officials.

The center's founding director was Duane "Dewey" Clarridge, a man who is not afraid of talking to reporters. Cofer Black, who ran the center during and after 9/11, was repeatedly named as such in the Post and trades on the experience to market himself as a paid speaker. Robert Grenier, who has also been named by the Post, highlighted the gig on the cover of his book.

It's not clear why D'Andrea is being treated differently by the Post. He is not an operative being deployed in any theaters—D'Andrea is a very high-level bureaucrat with an enormous amount of power and taxpayer resources at his disposal. He works at a desk in CIA headquarters in Langley, Va. Generally speaking, government officials at this level are not deliberately shielded from accountability by the government, or by the newspapers that cover it.

If it is the case, as Miller wrote, that D'Andrea was one of the people who would first face blame in the event of a terrorist attack on U.S. soil, it is difficult to imagine the justification for declining to name him. How would we know whom to blame?

It is likewise difficult to imagine that Miller would have been able to acquire the amount of color and detail he has on D'Andrea without the tacit cooperation of some current and former senior officials at the agency.

If security or classification concerns led agency officials to decide that D'Andrea's identity should be closely held, one would imagine that they would decline to cooperate with attempts by reporters to put details about his personal life—his religion, his exercise habits, his career history, his marital history—on the record. But Miller's reporting on D'Andrea has relied on interviews with or statements from "a former high-ranking CIA official who supervised the counterterrorism chief," "a former senior U.S. military official who worked closely with the CIA," former CIA director David Petraeus, former deputy CIA director Michael Morrell, and, in the case of today's valedictory, CIA spokesman Dean Boyd, who called Miller's unnamed subject "one of the true heroes of the agency."

Today's story states simply that the Post withheld D'Andrea's name "because he remains undercover," which is a different way of saying that his identity is classified (the 2012 story also cited "concerns for his safety" on the part of the agency).

But an assertion by the CIA that a given fact is classified has not always, on its own, stopped the Post from publishing in the past. Its reporting on the Snowden documents, for instance, has contained reams of classified information that the intelligence community did not want published.
The Post decided to publish it anyway, presumably for good reasons. Asked whether any additional concerns beyond the simple fact that the CIA has placed D'Andrea under cover motivated its decision to withhold his name today, a Post spokeswoman declined to comment.

Gawker asked Boyd, the CIA spokesman who commented on the record about D'Andrea for Miller's story, whether there was any reason not to publish D'Andrea's name. He replied that "we have officers who are undercover, and it's a federal crime to reveal them by name. I can't, by law, confirm that name."

The law Boyd referred to is the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, which makes it a crime for people with access to classified information—or others engaged in a "pattern of activities intended" to disrupt intelligence agencies—to reveal the names of "covert agents."

The statute defines "covert agents" as government officials whose identities are classified and who have served overseas within the last five years. Asked whether the outgoing director of the counterterrorism center had served overseas within the past five years, Boyd replied: "The person in that position has been in it for almost a decade. He is posted at CIA headquarters, which is in Langley, Va."

D'Andrea's successor in that post, according to Miller, is "an agency veteran who has held a series of high-level positions, including running the CIA's operations in Afghanistan. His name is Chris."

Contact the author at
Public PGP key
PGP fingerprint: 364F A5D5 ABEC C230 E40F 39FC 49FA 7D14 EAA7 110D
Use Gawker Media's SecureDrop to reach us privately.

CIA Assassin Heads Its Anti-Iran Operations

by Stephen Lendman

Michael D’Andrea (aka Langley’s Dark Prince or Ayatollah Mike for his conversion to Islam) headed the CIA’s Counter Terrorism Center.

He was involved in extraordinary rendition and torture prison activities, along with its drone operations - instruments of state terror, largely killing civilians, few so-called high-value terrorist targets, the alleged purpose of their missions.

In 2012, the neocon/CIA-connected Washington Post said “(w)hen his career began in 1979…Roger (his cover name) (was) an underperformer,” his superiors “down on him…He was getting very middling grades on his written work. (H)e seemed to be…a little beaten down.”

He’s come a long way since then, a key agency operative, currently in charge of anti-Iranian operations, the agency’s point man against the Islamic Republic under neocon director Mike Pompeo.

Iran is well versed in hostile US actions, dating from 1953, the CIA’s first coup against a foreign leader, ousting democratically elected Mohammad Mossadeq, many more to follow by toppling or assassination.

A generation of repression followed under Washington’s man in Tehran - Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, ousted in 1979, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini replacing him.

Nearly three decades of US hostility continues under Trump. He’s militantly anti-Iranian - blaming the Islamic Republic for US high crimes, continuing what his predecessors began, beginning with GHW Bush’s Gulf War, violently destabilizing the Middle East, claiming a nonexistent Iranian threat.

D’Andea’s former counterintelligence and current job involves extrajudicial covert operations, the CIA silent on what he’s up to.

No Iranian terrorist threat exists. No actions by its government support terrorist groups - despite what Trump, his national security team and past administrations claim - heavily influenced by Israeli and AIPAC disinformation and Big Lies.

Tehran’s nuclear program has no military component, now now or earlier, the country’s leadership wanting a nuclear-free Middle East.

Israel is the only regional nation known to have a menacing nuclear arsenal, its ICBMs capable of carrying nuclear warheads, the world community silent about the threat - irresponsibly bashing Iran over nothing.

During his confirmation hearing, neocon CIA director Pompeo pledged to be hardline on Iran. In a September 2016 Foreign Policy op-ed, he lied claiming “(i)t’s impossible to know for certain whether an Iranian business partner is a sponsor of terrorism - until it’s too late.”

His piece read like an AIPAC press release, outrageously accusing Tehran of “support(ing) terrorism, disrespect(ing) human rights, and nuclear proliferation.”

Whatever D’Andrea’s specific duties are, his mandate is extrajudicially targeting Iran aggressively, causing lots of mischief - solely for its sovereign independence.

Washington wants control over its enormous oil and gas reserves, along with seeking to eliminate Israel’s main regional rival.

The road to Tehran runs through Damascus. Washington’s aim is ousting Assad, then targeting Iran the same or similar way.

D’Andrea’s mandate is facilitating the process aggressively, a no-holds-barred approach.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at

Visit his blog site at

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

- See more at:

  • Civilian death toll rises to 484 from US-led coalition strikes in Iraq & Syria Published time: 2 Jun, 2017 16:46 Edited time: 3 Jun, 2017 19:01 Get short URL May 21, 2017 © Alaa Al-Marjani / Reuters... more
    • Why Won't the Post Name CIA Counterterrorism Chief Michael D — PS POST, Sun Jun 4 03:47
Click here to receive daily updates