Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
"He's a Lawyer for the People." 4.47 pm That is a Tele rece
Thu Oct 12, 2017 08:44

"He's a Lawyer for the People." 4.47 pm

That is a Tele receive from yesterday's post.

While researching the other day quite by accident happened to come across a story from 2014 that caught the attention. It concerned the arrest and criminal prosecution of Kerry Kennedy for driving impaired. From wiki.

In July 2012, Kennedy allegedly sideswiped a tractor trailer driven by Rocco Scuiletti on Interstate 684 in Westchester County.

On the morning of July 13, 2012, Kennedy was found in her white Lexus. A police report said Kennedy had trouble speaking, was swaying and told an officer that she may have accidentally taken a sleeping pill earlier that day.

In a court appearance on July 17, 2012, Kennedy said local hospital tests found no traces of drugs and that her doctor believed she had suffered a seizure. Kennedy pleaded not guilty to driving while impaired.

Scuiletti was charged by state police with leaving the scene of an accident. A toxicology report filed on July 25, 2012, said zolpidem was found in a sample of her blood taken when Kennedy was arrested, at which point Kennedy released a statement saying in part, "The results we received today from the Westchester County lab showed trace amounts of a sleep aid in my system, so it now appears that my first instinct was correct.

On January 23, 2014, Judge Robert Neary ruled that the drugged-driving case against Kennedy would move forward.

The judge acknowledged that she was "not a typical criminal defendant. She has achieved a great deal and is dedicated to good works." Despite this, the judge said dismissal might lead the public to believe "that there are two justice systems: one for the rich and powerful, and one for everybody else."

On February 20, 2014, jury selection for her trial began. Kennedy was not present, and was instead in Brussels and the Western Sahara conducting human rights advocacy.[

Kennedy was acquitted of the charges on February 28, 2014. "You have to wonder why this ill-advised prosecution was brought," Lefcourt said after the verdict. "Was it because of who the defendant is?

They concede it was accidental and nevertheless pursued this case. I find this very depressing." Prosecutors however defended their actions. "We prosecute 2,500 impaired driving cases annually in Westchester County. This case was treated no differently from any of the others," Lucian Chalfen, spokesman for the Westchester County District Attorney said.!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_1200/u90205017.jpg
Kerry Kennedy (left) and Andrew Cuomo during their 1990 wedding. (� BETTMANN/CORBIS)

On March 3, 2014, Kennedy appeared on NBC's Today and criticized Westchester County for prosecuting "people who the district attorney and police believe to be innocent of the crime, simply because of county protocol requiring all cases to be pursued.”

While insisting that being a member of the Kennedy family had nothing to do with the jury's verdict, she did mention the Criminal Justice Act and its 50th anniversary, which she said: "my father passed as Attorney General to assure access to counsel for indigent criminal defendants."

For those who follow the writings of Thomas Jefferson and George Wythe who prepared the Virgina papers between 1776 and 1779, might we not wonder how we have gotten so far away from the founding fathers explaining our Bill of Rights?

That is how is it that we fail to recognize that a judge, legally a corporate clerk, can decide to move a criminal prosecution forward lacking the certification of a grand jury that there is probable cause that a crime has been committed?

Bitch studied law all through college, took every law class that was available and never learned the true aspects of "Due process" as made the law of the land in 1791 with the ratification of the provisional acceptance agreement that made the the First Ten Amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the cornerstone of the United States of America.

The provisional acceptance agreement made in 1789 when the creation of the United States of America was rejected at Philadelphia due to the Constitution lacking a BIll of Rights.

Are we recalling from our history classes that it was the state delegates demand for a Bill of Rights that allowed for the creation of the United States of America in the first place?

Bitch clearly recalls a constitutional law professor mentioning "due process," and looking around the class with a curious look on his face as if winking at us, and not explaining what was due a litigant in a legal proceeding.

Bitchie studied law for decades after college, mostly civil law, and not until finding on the internet information about Jefferson and Wythe's research in 1776-1779, did he realize what are the truly significant aspects of due process found in American law.

Might we consider the Kennedy family is sophisticated, wealthy and would have access to effective legal resources? Kerry's father, Bobby Kennedy was the attorney general of the United States of America.

Can we try to imagine what could have happened to a regular person in the same situation? Maybe wind up convicted of something that the driver had no intention to harm merely had a medical side effect of a cold remedy or something similar?

While this sounds a bit technical, and it is, might we think about law professor George Wythe (1726-1806) and Thomas Jefferson uncovering the logic principle behind the most significant aspects of our wonderful American legal system?

Might the usefulness of our rights to everyone be why Judah screwed us out of our rights?

Bitch could note, the primary sources of the Virginia papers Bitch did not find on the internet. It was from secondary interpretive sources as to how he became aware of the significance of what Jefferson and Wythe had uncovered concerning American legal process.

The understanding is that the Virgina papers comprise correspondence with numerous persons during that time frame and only some of these letters were found on the internet.

Might we only wonder did Jefferson or Wythe come upon their findings from a letter they received from an interested party alerting them to the corporate nature of the state requiring the state to first have legal standing to pursue a legal action?

Whatever it was, the procedural aspect of interest here is to give us a context that even a wealthy and highly educated person, Kerry Kennedy, missed receiving the full benefits of the protective function of the American Bill of Rights concerning the issue of legal standing and also being forced to give testimony against herself.

New York State Constitution

As Revised, including amendments
effective January 1, 2014


(1)[Preamble] We The People of the State of New York, grateful to Almighty God for our Freedom, in order to secure its blessings, DO ESTABLISH THIS CONSTITUTION.

[Grand jury; protection of certain enumerated rights; duty of public officers to sign waiver of immunity and give testimony; penalty for refusal]

§6. No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime (except in cases of impeachment, and in cases of militia when in actual service, and the land, air and naval forces in time of war, or which this state may keep with the consent of congress in time of peace, and in cases of petit larceny under the regulation of the legislature), unless on indictment of a grand jury, except that a person held for the action of a grand jury upon a charge for such an offense, other than one punishable by death or life imprisonment, with the consent of the district attorney, may waive indictment by a grand jury and consent to be prosecuted on an information filed by the district attorney; such waiver shall be evidenced by written instrument signed by the defendant in open court in the presence of his or her counsel.

In any trial in any court whatever the party accused shall be allowed to appear and defend in person and with counsel as in civil actions and shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation and be confronted with the witnesses against him or her.

No person shall be subject to be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense; nor shall he or she be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself or herself,

The power of grand juries to inquire into the wilful misconduct in office of public officers, and to find indictments or to direct the filing of informations in connection with such inquiries, shall never be suspended or impaired by law. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.
"No person shall be subject to be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense; nor shall he or she be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself or herself,"

Have we noticed how completely the moth Judah has eaten out that sacred provision of our constitution with his drug tests?

Might we perceive that Judah numerous drug laws are aimed at taking our rights away from us?

Though have we not read many times that the drugs laws were designed to protect our kids from drug pushers?

By getting caught red-handed attacking us with enough nuclear blast force to kill most of us immediately with the survivors dying off shortly afterward from radioactive fallout might we not be done with their fairy tale of the state's interest in protecting us?

In the prosecution of Kerry Kennedy here attorney said, "prosecutors concede her collision was accidental and nevertheless pursued this case. I find this very depressing."

Prosecutors however defended their actions. "We prosecute 2,500 impaired driving cases annually in Westchester County. This case was treated no differently from any of the others," a spokesman for the Westchester County District Attorney said.
If we think about our basic law, do we recall that there must be intent to commit a crime as the key element for a crime to be committed?

When our American Bill of Rights are in are we not in agreement that it is a grand jury and a jury that determines intent based on the facts of the situation? certainly.

The primary protective issue, do we see is having a grand jury make the call as to whether or not there was or is "probable cause" that a crime was committed?

"We prosecute 2,500 impaired driving cases annually in Westchester County."

Might we only wonder were those 2,500 criminal prosecutions without a grand jury first deciding if there was "probable cause" that a crime had been committed as in the Kerry case?

Can we only wonder how many of those 2,500 prosecutions in just that one county involved someone taking an over the counter cold medication that caused them to momentarily blink and swerve out of their lane getting a ticket and then criminally prosecuted?

In the Kerry Kennedy case did we note that the other driver swerved into her car causing the accident in the first place?

Have we not noted how Judah ops are known for forcing criminal complaints by his actions towards those that he opposes?

The tractor-trailer that was driven by Rocco Scuiletti that swerved and hit her car that caused Kerry to crash. Might we only wonder if there was cash involved in that?

Might a proper grand jury not have looked into that?

Are ordinary people getting some idea just how important rights are to us?

The 2,500 people prosecuted for impaired driving just in that one county, Westchester, can we only wonder how seriously those criminal prosecutions may have negatively affected their lives?

Making court appearances. Hiring lawyers. Jail time, court costs and fines. Might some have lost their jobs and with it their income source because of court sport?

Will American Labor not help us and put our full Bill of Rights in once again?

Can we only wonder was putting Kerry through the criminal prosecution part of a vendetta?

Will Labor not get hold of the authority to issue our money away from international Jewish and end their ability to lavishly finance their free state supported vendetta sports?

Will Labor not put our rights in?

George Wythe assassinated after informing us how rights operate in the corporate state environment.

Labor leader William Sylvis assassinated in 1869 after informing us that Labor needs to have a seat at the table where our money is issued from.

Labor leader Eugene Debs imprisoned for years for helping convince Labor that we do not have to go to war.

The Hofer brothers tortured to death in Alcatraz for refusing to murder their brothers and sisters for Judah investment sports war.

John Kennedy assassinated for taking the authority to issue our money out of Judah's hands. How about a century before when President Lincoln was assassinated for implementing the same plan, issuing our full faith and credit money from the US Treasury and not fiat money from the bankers?

Dr. King assassinated for explaining the survival need to love one another.

Harold Washington assassinated for explaining why we need to get rid of nuclear weapons.

The history of death and destruction that Jewish bring in as their plan. Budget Judee gets hit by weap Judee as the rest of us do.

Taking the peoples rights away in every land to set them up.

As our genocide causally and leisurely moves forward will American working people not give us a new plan?

"We took your great baby out," Judee say.

Our children now poisoned by radioactive waste intentionally poured into our environment.

Our technology now at an extraterrestrial level, combined with free Labor able to easily feed house and clothe all of God's children on earth using clean, advanced high technology.

But Judah won't tolerate it while he has our purse in his hands. Only the destruction of man is allowed.

"Ethically they're criminals. They're no friends of mine. I died them truthful. They've poisoned my village; I want them off."

What might explain that even though our good God in His mercy justice and wisdom is dying Jewish off due to their weakness, their inability to accommodate others, American Labor keeps funding their world war sport?

What might explain why we are destroying our beautiful nation and dying ourselves off?

Whatever are the fears will Labor not let them off right?

The invisible fear that holds us. Might it help balance the issue if we think of the invisible vapor grip of brimstone nanoparticles that Judah has put upon us?

"It's a delightful oppression, delightful dusting here; pull them off.

They got you out civil rights to foul you good, STRIKE THEM OUT, take the bench from them."

Thank you, Sir Jason and Sir Morris, for those telepathic messages today.

Unknown lights hovering above Seattle, Washington 9-Oct-2017
October 10, 2017
video 3.28 at

Are we not recognizing nuclear warheads in a controlled burn off when we see them now?

Unknown lights hovering above Tijuana, Mexico 28-Sep-2017

Nuclear warheads burning off under the control of Sir Casper and His diligent teams of Martians. Can we not say a prayer of thanks to Papa for sending His angels in to save us?

Will We not say a thank you prayer to Father for saving us from being turned into Jewish hobbyists and investors radioactive dust?

Filer’s Files # 41 -2017 Navy Detects USOs
October 10, 2017
Marc was on board a US Navy submarine when he saw the USO, (unidentified submerged object).

Continues at

“I was sitting there zoning out a little because I was sea sick and all of a sudden the sonar kid shouts ‘fast mover, fast mover’ and

  • The Final Fleecing Of AmericaWilliam Mount, Thu Oct 12 05:26
    Here you get more now in 15 minutes than anywhere else. ========== THE FINAL FLEECING OF AMERICANS ========== WE ARE FOLLOWING THE MONEY ========== TODAY WE HAVE CHARLES THORNGREN ON - WELCOME... more
    • "He's a Lawyer for the People." 4.47 pm That is a Tele rece — Patrick Sullivan, Thu Oct 12 08:44
Click here to receive daily updates