SESNow on THAT we disagree.Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:55am220.127.116.11If a family has, for example, $50,000 in the bank, they should NOT be getting Food Stamps.
That would be ridiculous.
Food Stamps are supposed to be for people who are in desperate need. People with $50,000 in the bank aren't in desperate need.
And if they lose their job, they already get unemployment.
- If the family bread winner loses his job thanks to a BUSTED sT, Fri Feb 11 11:28amEconomy, Food Stamps SHOULD BE READILY AVAILABLE, withOUT forcing life savings to be cashed in.
- Now on THAT we disagree. SES, Fri Feb 11 11:55am
- Unemployment won't pay the mortgage. Do U REALLY want to sT, Fri Feb 11 2:43pmkick kids out onto the streets or take away a life savings that some1 is hoping to add to their S.S. when they get too old to drag themselves to work every day?
Religion and Ethics BBS