Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Thanks for the clarification.
Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:14pm

I certainly won't apologize for my interpretation, as I think it was perfectly reasonable, but I very much appreciate the clarification.

And yes, the Charles/Diana thing was a bit skeevy...but I also understand that Royals aren't exactly given free rein (or should that be "reign?" See what I did there?) in terms of their courtships and marriages. At least they're not marrying them off as pre-pubescents any more.

  • I strongly disagree that "the implication of = was clear".Mondo Fuego™ , Tue Nov 14 10:39am
    If it appeared that way to you, then my assurance to you that such was not the actual or intended case should enable you to move beyond that. What is abundantly clear is that non-consensual advances, ... more
    • Thanks for the clarification. — Poppet, Tue Nov 14 1:14pm
Click here to receive daily updates

Religion and Ethics BBS