Kim Sargerson
re: Joe some assistance please
Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:11
86.170.22.40

Hi Joe

Many thanks for the correct plate reference. I also thank you for re-posting Gabolde's thoughts on this, which (to me) make perfect sense. Although it is not explicit any where that Baketaten is the daughter of Akhenaten, let alone of Kiya, such a position also make sense.

As Nefertiti is the only known wife of Akhenaten who certainly had more than one child, one is led to the conclusion that the male child shown is a son of Nefertiti.

Whether this child is also to be identified with Tutankhuaten is another matter.

Jan: hope you read this and can check out the correct plate reference 433/VIIIC, rather than 43/VIIIC which I erroneously repeated.

Regards to both

Kim

  • Re: Joe some assistance pleaseJoe Baker, Thu Jul 22 07:39
    Hi Kim Apology for writing 43-VIIIC it is actually 433/VIII C. I have this information from an old post of the French Egyptologists Marc Gabolde which he sent to the original but now defunct Amarna... more
    • block 433/VIIICJan Bailey, Tue Jul 27 02:23
      Hi I now have an image of block 433/VIIIC, as well as the other images from Heliopolis. (I can send off line to you Joe) Sorry, but it would take a whole lot of imagination to make the squiggles into ... more
      • Re: block 433/VIIICJoe Baker, Thu Jul 29 07:04
        Hi Jan Thanks for the picture. Well I for one can not make much out of it. Presumably those who have done extensive work on the style of royal depictions in the Amarna pictures can make more sense... more
      • block 433/VIIICJan Bailey, Wed Jul 28 03:26
        whoops, of course I mean Hermopolis!
    • re: Joe some assistance please — Kim Sargerson, Thu Jul 22 12:11
Click here to receive daily updates