Re: Correction
Tue Aug 30, 2016 00:10

Murnane's article does not take a position with respect to the papyri in question. It also doesn't discuss the contents of the papyri in any satisfactory way that can be described scholarly rigor. His book is still the classic treatment of coregencies in Egypt but the editors of SAOC who published it have said it is now way outdated and a new work is needed. I agree.


  • Re: CorrectionKim Sargerson, Mon Aug 29 22:47
    Hi Tory I did say it was the closest Aldred came. For a while (about 2 years) it convinced me. But then came Murnane's article... Kim
    • Re: Correction — Tory, Tue Aug 30 00:10
Click here to receive daily updates