Marianne Luban
re: Psusennes I and Solomon
Sat Apr 14, 2018 13:05
75.169.199.105

Anonymous wrote:

"This article by Nadav Na'aman may be of interest, as it links King David and Pharaoh Psusennes I: "Hebron was built seven years before Zoan in Egypt" (Numbers XIII 22), Vetus Testamentum 31 (1981), pp. 488-492.

Essentially Na'aman holds that Numbers 13:22 records the seven-year difference between when Hebron was built (that is, fortified as a royal city) by David and when Zoan in Egypt was so fortified by Psusennes I. Given that Psusennes ruled from 1047 BC to 1004 BC, this synchronism dates David's accession as King of Judah (in Hebron) to 1047 BC (or Autumn of 1048 BC if allowance is made for the half-year of his reign). The end of David's forty-year reign (seven at Hebron and 33 at Jerusalem) dates Solomon's accession in Jerusalem to 1007 BC. It follows that the daughter of Pharaoh whom Solomon married was the daughter of Psusennes's successor."

I find this convincing. Hebron surely existed as a settlement but took on a new significance because David was anointed king there and it was his residence for seven years. There has to be some reason for comparing Hebron chronologically to Tanis--as Hebron has other Biblical significance going back to the burials in the Cave of Machpelah being purchased by Abraham. Tanis, although not mentioned until the time of Dynasty 19, being the capital of the 14th Nome of Lower Egypt, did not become a royal city before Psusennes I, who had so much from the royal city of Ramesses II [whose branch of the Nile had silted up] dragged there.





  • re: Psusennes I and SolomonAnonymous , Fri Apr 13 15:22
    This article by Nadav Na'aman may be of interest, as it links King David and Pharaoh Psusennes I: "Hebron was built seven years before Zoan in Egypt" (Numbers XIII 22), Vetus Testamentum 31 (1981),... more
    • re: Psusennes I and Solomon — Marianne Luban, Sat Apr 14 13:05
      • re: Psusennes I and SolomonAnonymous, Mon Apr 16 16:33
        Anonymous wrote: "This article by Nadav Na'aman may be of interest, as it links King David and Pharaoh Psusennes I: "Hebron was built seven years before Zoan in Egypt" (Numbers XIII 22), Vetus... more
        • re: Psusennes I and SolomonMarianne Luban, Mon Apr 16 17:21
          Anonymous wrote: "Marianne, you may also find it of interest that Flavius Josephus records an 80-year reign for King Solomon (Jewish Antiquities 8.211). So if the year of Solomon's accession was 1007 ... more
          • re: Psusennes I and SolomonAnonymous , Wed Apr 18 16:55
            Anonymous wrote: "Marianne, you may also find it of interest that Flavius Josephus records an 80-year reign for King Solomon ( Jewish Antiquities 8.211). So if the year of Solomon's accession was... more
            • Ages and DatesMarianne Luban, Thu Apr 19 10:47
              94 is a perfectly possible duration of life and one can't help but notice how much more reasonable the years of people on earth become with the advent of the Monarchy. Had Solomon been a myth, one... more
              • Re: Ages and DatesAnonymous , Thu Apr 19 15:56
                Marianne wrote: "It is my belief that Avaris could never be separated from an exodus in the minds of the ancient historians. Is it a mere coincidence that 1510 BCE falls within the reign of Thutmose... more
                • Re: Ages and DatesMarianne Luban, Thu Apr 19 18:12
                  Anonymous wrote: "Marianne wrote more but the quote above is what I want to address. So here goes. Avaris was indeed connected with the Israelite exodus from Egypt. However, the early "church... more
                  • Re: Ages and DatesAnonymous, Fri Apr 20 14:11
                    Marianne wrote: " I am of the opinion that Moses was still young in the reign of Ahmose, as Syncellus pointed out. This makes sense to me for several reasons." Anonymous: So did Syncellus get it... more
                    • Re: Ages and DatesMarianne Luban, Fri Apr 20 16:04
                      I really don't like the idea that somebody posts here without having the courage of their convictions to do so under their own name. I thought you might be a reasonable interlocutor, at first--but... more
      • re: Tanis and Psusennes IRich McQuillen, Sat Apr 14 17:54
        "did not become a royal city before Psusennes I, who had so much from the royal city of Ramesses II [whose branch of the Nile had silted up] dragged there." -- I just watched "Secrets of the dead:... more
        • re: Tanis and Psusennes IMarianne Luban, Sun Apr 15 11:19
          Rich wrote: "Now something I'm confused about is Smendes, 1077/10761052 BC, seems to have reigned from Tanis before Psusennes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smendes "While Smendes' precise origins... more
Click here to receive daily updates