Joe Baker
Re: Does Sotthic Dating disprove Rohl?
Fri May 18, 2018 23:48
2001:8003:8817:5900:809b:ed8e:3e66:ac64

Hi Toby

Could you please stop posting the same message to multiple groups/forums. For example you have posted this “Sothic Dates for Egyptian Pharaoh's” to at least also the NewChronology and the AncientBibleHistory groups. Also maybe you should confine your Rohl questions to the NewChronology list - many of those here also subscribe to that list.

Regards Joe


  • Does Sotthic Dating disprove Rohl?Toby Andersonz, Thu May 17 22:24
    Sothic Dates for Egyptian Pharaoh's --- initial findings 5/17/18: I've found 2 Pharoah's which have been dated using Sothic dating. I've looked at 3 'modern' sources. Results: 1. Senwosret III (1878... more
    • Re: Does Sotthic Dating disprove Rohl? — Joe Baker, Fri May 18 23:48
      • Re: Does Sotthic Dating disprove Rohl?Toby Anderson, Sat May 19 09:12
        Hi Joe, Sure. I don't understand why you want me to stop posting on multiple groups and don't understand why you don't want me to post on Rohl. I've always liked the exchange of ideas.... I'm so... more
        • Re: Does Sotthic Dating disprove Rohl?Joe Baker, Sun May 20 21:19
          Hi Toby When I started posting to lists some 20 years ago it was common etiquette not to crosspost. As for Rohl. I came across his book “A Test of Time” (paperback edition) back in the mid 1990’s at... more
          • Re: Does Sotthic Dating disprove Rohl?Toby Anderson, Mon May 21 23:35
            Greetings Joe, Fascinating background you have. Are the Cambridge Ancient History 'booklets' your favorite read? Thanks for footing the bill to this discussion group. Thoughtful. You might consider... more
    • re: Sothic DatingMarianne Luban, Fri May 18 10:47
      Toby wrote: "I've found 2 Pharoah's which have been dated using Sothic dating. I've looked at 3 'modern' sources. Results: 1. Senwosret III (1878 BC to 1839BC) - 12th Dynasty 2. Amenemhet III (1860... more
Click here to receive daily updates