Toby Charles Anderson
Jericho
Wed Jun 13, 2018 15:55
173.25.33.79

"Why did you ignore the scarabs in your posting." -- Toby
"If there are scarabs of pharoahs here, then the 1550BC date turns into 1435BC." -- Rich

-- We're in agreement, the scarabs are absolute. I didn't ignore it. I moved the date 115 years forward. --Rich

oh. Ok. Must have missed that. Sorry. Toby

  • re: JerichoRich McQuillen, Mon Jun 11 22:34
    "Why did you ignore the scarabs in your posting." -- Toby "If there are scarabs of pharoahs here, then the 1550BC date turns into 1435BC." -- me -- We're in agreement, the scarabs are absolute. I... more
    • re: minor date correctionRich McQuillen, Sun Jun 17 12:27
      "If there are scarabs of pharoahs here, then the 1550BC date turns into 1435BC." -- me I misread Amenhotep ii instead of 3. Amenhotep 2 would have ended in 1435BC. I have Amenhotep 3 ending around... more
    • Jericho — Toby Charles Anderson, Wed Jun 13 15:55
    • re: JerichoMarianne Luban, Tue Jun 12 12:02
      Rich wrote: "-- We're in agreement, the scarabs are absolute." They are absolute in that they provide a terminus for scarabs among the burials--that terminus being the reign of Amenhotep III.... more
Click here to receive daily updates