Rich McQuillen
re: minor date correction
Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:27
73.205.221.1

"If there are scarabs of pharoahs here, then the 1550BC date turns into 1435BC." -- me

I misread Amenhotep ii instead of 3. Amenhotep 2 would have ended in 1435BC.

I have Amenhotep 3 ending around 1389 on my list; wiki has 1351. So my 1435BC date turns into 1351BC (we'll go with the official for this topic).

  • re: JerichoRich McQuillen, Mon Jun 11 22:34
    "Why did you ignore the scarabs in your posting." -- Toby "If there are scarabs of pharoahs here, then the 1550BC date turns into 1435BC." -- me -- We're in agreement, the scarabs are absolute. I... more
    • re: minor date correction — Rich McQuillen, Sun Jun 17 12:27
    • JerichoToby Charles Anderson, Wed Jun 13 15:55
      "Why did you ignore the scarabs in your posting." -- Toby "If there are scarabs of pharoahs here, then the 1550BC date turns into 1435BC." -- Rich -- We're in agreement, the scarabs are absolute. I... more
    • re: JerichoMarianne Luban, Tue Jun 12 12:02
      Rich wrote: "-- We're in agreement, the scarabs are absolute." They are absolute in that they provide a terminus for scarabs among the burials--that terminus being the reign of Amenhotep III.... more
Click here to receive daily updates