Rich McQuillen
re: Kinglist of Eratosthenes
Wed Aug 22, 2018 19:21
73.205.221.1

It's possible that #1 Menes was instead: Amenemnisu
and #38 Amouthartaios was instead Teos.
Sistoikhermes for Amasis is a guess, that should have been red. That could have been PsamtikII.

  • re: Kinglist of EratosthenesRich McQuillen, Wed Aug 22 18:16
    https://pharaoh.se/eratosthenes-king-list Every couple of years, I take a shot at deciphering this list. Last night, I finally figured it out. Basically, there are two columns. This seems to be at... more
    • re: Kinglist of EratosthenesRobert Killian, Fri Aug 24 08:43
      Ac,King Saul 1048BC to 1008BC = 2844AM to 2884AM. 40yrs. Psusennes I 1047BC to 1001BC = 2845AM to 2891AM = 46yrs. Amenemope 1001BC to 992BC = 2891AM to 2900AM 9rs. Death Saul ac.King David, 30yrs... more
    • re: Kinglist of EratosthenesMarianne Luban, Thu Aug 23 10:41
      Sorry to rain on your parade, Rich, but the kinglist of Eratosthenes can only be deciphered by someone who knows the Egyptian language--for obvious reasons. 1. Menes [first on everybody's list] 2.... more
    • re: Kinglist of Eratosthenes — Rich McQuillen, Wed Aug 22 19:21
      • re: Kinglist of EratosthenesMarianne Luban, Thu Aug 23 11:35
        Rich wrote: "It's possible that #1 Menes was instead: Amenemnisu and #38 Amouthartaios was instead Teos. Sistoikhermes for Amasis is a guess, that should have been red. That could have been... more
        • re: Kinglist of EratosthenesRich McQuillen, Fri Aug 24 00:05
          Hi Maryanne, Thanks for the comments... and I appreciate any collaboration. This list has baffling experts for a long time... so it's a little bit fun for me too. On collaboration, you know, I don't... more
          • re: Kinglist of EratosthenesMarianne Luban, Fri Aug 24 10:12
            Rich wrote: "Hi Maryanne, Thanks for the comments... and I appreciate any collaboration. This list has baffling experts for a long time.." Not a chance, Rich. No collaboration. You and I do not view... more
        • re: Kinglist of EratosthenesMarianne Luban, Thu Aug 23 11:58
          I wrote: "The only fragment that really interests me is Fr. 40 because it seems to indicate what men of the early days of Egyptology believed--and that is that Siptah came before Seti II--instead of... more
Click here to receive daily updates