Re: A Clarification
Fri Jun 27, 2003 08:56 (XFF:

Dear leo,

Some comments :
- the article on Takelto III is not a hope, it is reality, I will send it the next months probably. I thought I had spoken of it earlier...
- the n 3 can not be Rudamon, but is clearly Sheshonq I or IV or a new theban Sheshonq VIa (bothe later hypothesis by Broekman). I thought I had spoken of n 43 for Rudamon, year 3. It can not be Iny because it is a mry-im, unlike Iny.
- Your remarks on the impossibility of Tak III in Wadi Gasus fits only if year 12 is Piankhy, but it can be Kashta and here Tak III fits well, there is all place after for Rudamon, Iny an others...



  • A ClarificationLeo, Fri Jun 27 03:52
    As an aside after thinking things through, I still do hope that you FREDERIC or one of his fellow professional classmates will publish "THE CASE" for dating the Berlin Papyrus in the future in GM or... more
    • Re: A Clarification — Fred, Fri Jun 27 08:56
      • Re: A ClarificationIan, Fri Jun 27 09:37
        Dear Fred, Can you please tell me where in Paris one could obtain the new volume of JEA? I have people hunting for it. Although your response to Leo contains some of the answers, I would appreciate... more
        • JEA 88Jean-Fred, Fri Jun 27 12:04
          Dear Ian Just a very quick note! JEA 88 has reached Montreal earlier this week and I'm going to my friend's house tonight in order to have a look at it (my friend is member of the EES who publishes... more
          • JEA 88, correction, and TefnakhtIan, Fri Jun 27 12:23
            Dear Jean-Fred, Thanks for the note, and even though I still hope my friends in Paris turn it up somewhere on St-Michel, I will be very happy to get copies from you should they fail. I will be happy... more
            • Wadi Gasus, Takelot III and JF's offerLeo, Sat Jun 28 02:38
              Hello JF, Fred and All, JF, an offer of help from you wld be appreciated concerning just the Broekeman paper. You stated that there were Four articles of deep interest to you in the more recent JEA... more
              • Dear Leo,and all some comments : Leo :Fred's suggestion that Year 19 of WG could belong to Kashta and Year 12 to Takelot III seems particularly tenous since Amenirdis I(Kashta's Grand daughter) 1)may ... more
                • Amenirdis I & Ini Si-EseLeo, Sat Jun 28 15:09
                  Oops...Please ignore my other post below with the same title. I must have hit the return key a bit too early. Firstly, my apologies to Fred, I did not recall that Amenirdis I was the Daughter of... more
                  • Re: Amenirdis I & Ini Si-EseLeo, Sat Jun 28 17:33
                    The Year 3 Quay text that Broekeman speaks about wld have been made c.15-20 Years after the Year 6 QLT for Takelot III. Assuming Takelot III had a reign of 19 Years, his Year 19 minus his Year 6 wld... more
                    • Re: Amenirdis I & Ini Si-EseIan, Sat Jun 28 18:00
                      Dear Leo, In fact the epithet -meryamun would be applicable to virtually any pharaoh of this period (or for that matter for anyone from Ramesses II to Taharqo). I have yet to see Broekman's... more
                • Amenirdis I & Ini Si-Ese (nm)Leo, Sat Jun 28 14:36
Click here to receive daily updates