Sprout
But why would they?
Fri Sep 1, 2017 7:37pm
192.86.118.14

If you make the flood prone areas more expensive the rich will buy up the non-flood prone areas. Rich folks generally didn't get rich by making foolish financial decisions. So, if you make the flood plain prohibitively expensive the rich will buy up the OTHER land outbidding the poor, leaving only the prohibitively expensive stuff for those who can least afford it.

So, the poor will STILL be in the flood-prone areas. They will just have a harder time paying their monthly notes.

Unless we are also discussing some sort of means testing to only ALLOW folks of limited means to purchase in the non-flood-prone areas.

  • It won't "price them out of the cities"Jeeves, Fri Sep 1 7:11pm
    Only the wetlands. Which tend to flood anyway. The current system tends to concentrate the poor in flood-prone areas. Why not put the wealthy, who can afford the loss, in the floodplane?
    • But why would they? — Sprout, Fri Sep 1 7:37pm
      • Let's just say I don't agree
        • OK... I'm hard pressed to understand whySprout, Fri Sep 1 8:06pm
          wealthy folks would intentionally choose to build on land that will be VASTLY more expensive tax wise voluntarily as opposed to building on land that would be much cheaper tax wise to build on?
          • Now you understand Jeeves, Fri Sep 1 9:20pm
            The goal is to have people NOT build on wetlands/floodplains. 8^)
              • No you don't.HeavyHemi, Sat Sep 2 2:26pm
                Why do you insist that something thinks or is saying something despite them telling you directly you're wrong?
                • If not, who do you expect to END UP with it? By reducing the SUPPLY of a commodity without reducing the DEMAND for a commodity, how do you plan on AVOIDING a price increase? And if you don't, who do... more
                  • It's the tax structure that forces the destruction of the environment. In my county not so very long ago standing timber (TREES) was taxed. What did that encourage? Yep, you guessed it. Land holdings ... more
                  • You mean I can only use your metrics?HeavyHemi, Sat Sep 2 5:41pm
                    That the ONLY way to implement policy is via taxation. Methinks you're repeating the same mistakes we point out to you time and time again: The argument you are having in your head, isn't the one... more
                    • Taxation was the proposed solution...Sprout, Mon Sep 4 4:57pm
                      Not my proposal, but the proposal we have been discussing. Care to offer a different proposal? One that WOULD in some way not only prevent construction on flood prone lands, but ALSO ensure that real ... more