Repeating your deflection from the topic is conceding Spout.
Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:57am

The White House isn't pointing that out. The White Houses is saying criticizing the President is the offense she should be fired for. For all we know the MAJORITY of the people who heard it agree. However AS YOU KNOW, that isn't the point. I'll be bet you'll play stupid and try ig again...or maybe you'll surprise us and grow up a little.

  • So?Sprout, Fri Sep 15 11:44am
    Why would the white house pointing out that pissing off paying customers can get you fired be a big deal to you?
    • Repeating your deflection from the topic is conceding Spout. — HeavyHemi, Fri Sep 15 11:57am
      • Had a white person PH🌚🌚EY, Sun Sep 17 8:53am
        Stated Obama was a black supremacist, you can be sure he or she would be canned. Especially if the last name is LEE.
      • That is certainly how you would like toSprout, Fri Sep 15 2:07pm
        portray the events... But, as you may have noticed, but likely dismissed, your own opinion isn't the only one out there.
        • which is not an opinion. It was an explicit statement she should be fired, and stated repeatedly as an official White House policy. Here's my opinion: if this had occurred under Obama you would have... more
          • Should? Or could? Think on it.Sprout, Fri Sep 15 2:57pm
            Nah... I've never been one to fawn over celebrities... Nor did I get spooled up about Michele Obama's outfits like your peers did over the shoes the first lady wore to the plane. But I guess when you ... more
            • I've no idea what you're babbling about.HeavyHemi, Fri Sep 15 3:30pm
              The topic is the White House explicitly advocating for a private citizen to be fired for criticizing the President. Celebrity status has zero do with it. Your replies are bizarre, though I guess when ... more
              • He ought to be fired!PH🌚🌚EY, Sun Sep 17 8:59am
                For lying. And while you dwell on " private," the fact is this racist sportscaster is a public persona with influence in the world of jock straps and itch. He should stick with his profession and... more
                • or only CERTAIN opinions not being legally protected? Keep in mind, it's the GOVERNMENT suggesting he be fired for expressing his OPINION, not the general population exercising its right to an... more
                  • The category is hate speech.PH👀EY, Sun Sep 17 4:31pm
                    He can say what he wants. But it's outside of his job description, a vaunted position for which he has taken advantage to spew an untruth. I think he should be canned. If football players are going... more
              • Did they? Interesting perspective. (nm)Sprout, Fri Sep 15 3:34pm
                • yet fail to inform yourself prior to entering a discussion. Not once, but several times. It's in interesting perspective you believe that paints you in a positive light. Since you're going to... more
                  • Is this thread for flippin' REAL?Sia☺giah, Sun Sep 17 12:09am
                    It was abundantly OBVIOUS what the topic of discussion was -- The WHITE HOUSE spokesman suggested that ESPN should FIRE their employee for criticizing the POTUS. It had absolutely NOTHING to do with... more