HeavyHemi
Indeed a factual portrayal as again stated by Ms Sanders..
Fri Sep 15, 2017 2:35pm
63.224.33.222

which is not an opinion. It was an explicit statement she should be fired, and stated repeatedly as an official White House policy. Here's my opinion: if this had occurred under Obama you would have been enraged. Alas, you're never going to grow up, Spout.

  • That is certainly how you would like toSprout, Fri Sep 15 2:07pm
    portray the events... But, as you may have noticed, but likely dismissed, your own opinion isn't the only one out there.
    • Indeed a factual portrayal as again stated by Ms Sanders.. — HeavyHemi, Fri Sep 15 2:35pm
      • Should? Or could? Think on it.Sprout, Fri Sep 15 2:57pm
        Nah... I've never been one to fawn over celebrities... Nor did I get spooled up about Michele Obama's outfits like your peers did over the shoes the first lady wore to the plane. But I guess when you ... more
        • I've no idea what you're babbling about.HeavyHemi, Fri Sep 15 3:30pm
          The topic is the White House explicitly advocating for a private citizen to be fired for criticizing the President. Celebrity status has zero do with it. Your replies are bizarre, though I guess when ... more
          • He ought to be fired!PH🌚🌚EY, Sun Sep 17 8:59am
            For lying. And while you dwell on " private," the fact is this racist sportscaster is a public persona with influence in the world of jock straps and itch. He should stick with his profession and... more
            • or only CERTAIN opinions not being legally protected? Keep in mind, it's the GOVERNMENT suggesting he be fired for expressing his OPINION, not the general population exercising its right to an... more
              • The category is hate speech.PH👀EY, Sun Sep 17 4:31pm
                He can say what he wants. But it's outside of his job description, a vaunted position for which he has taken advantage to spew an untruth. I think he should be canned. If football players are going... more
          • Did they? Interesting perspective. (nm)Sprout, Fri Sep 15 3:34pm
            • yet fail to inform yourself prior to entering a discussion. Not once, but several times. It's in interesting perspective you believe that paints you in a positive light. Since you're going to... more
              • Is this thread for flippin' REAL?Sia☺giah, Sun Sep 17 12:09am
                It was abundantly OBVIOUS what the topic of discussion was -- The WHITE HOUSE spokesman suggested that ESPN should FIRE their employee for criticizing the POTUS. It had absolutely NOTHING to do with... more