PH🌚🌚EY
The White Hous did not argue anything.
Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:50am
166.182.66.20

Ms. Sanders put forth the inference.

  • is the topic. Nobody is surprised you don't know that, Spout.
    • The White Hous did not argue anything. — PH🌚🌚EY, Sun Sep 17 8:50am
      • WHO do you think Ms Sanders is? SPOKESMAN for the WHSia☺giah, Sun Sep 17 12:11pm
        So, YES, that's precisely what she did. What she says while in the performance of her WH Spokesman job IS speaking for the WH & tRUMP's positions
        • Okay, so fire him. PH👻👻EY, Sun Sep 17 4:25pm
          It was a racist remark. No doubt this football beaten brain wants to remove the Confederate statues, too. I think her remark was spot on.
          • racism. Besides, the remarks made by the black man about tRUMP were NOT RACISM nor were they HATE SPEECH. They were an opinion on tRUMP's behavior and words. NOT on "whites" in general, which they'd... more
        • He's just trolling for my attention.HeavyHemi, Sun Sep 17 12:43pm
          How else to explain the numerous panic posts spewing an opposing view even if it is off topic.
    • So?Sprout, Fri Sep 15 11:44am
      Why would the white house pointing out that pissing off paying customers can get you fired be a big deal to you?
      • The White House isn't pointing that out. The White Houses is saying criticizing the President is the offense she should be fired for. For all we know the MAJORITY of the people who heard it agree.... more
        • Had a white person PH🌚🌚EY, Sun Sep 17 8:53am
          Stated Obama was a black supremacist, you can be sure he or she would be canned. Especially if the last name is LEE.
        • That is certainly how you would like toSprout, Fri Sep 15 2:07pm
          portray the events... But, as you may have noticed, but likely dismissed, your own opinion isn't the only one out there.
          • which is not an opinion. It was an explicit statement she should be fired, and stated repeatedly as an official White House policy. Here's my opinion: if this had occurred under Obama you would have... more
            • Should? Or could? Think on it.Sprout, Fri Sep 15 2:57pm
              Nah... I've never been one to fawn over celebrities... Nor did I get spooled up about Michele Obama's outfits like your peers did over the shoes the first lady wore to the plane. But I guess when you ... more
              • I've no idea what you're babbling about.HeavyHemi, Fri Sep 15 3:30pm
                The topic is the White House explicitly advocating for a private citizen to be fired for criticizing the President. Celebrity status has zero do with it. Your replies are bizarre, though I guess when ... more
                • He ought to be fired!PH🌚🌚EY, Sun Sep 17 8:59am
                  For lying. And while you dwell on " private," the fact is this racist sportscaster is a public persona with influence in the world of jock straps and itch. He should stick with his profession and... more
                  • or only CERTAIN opinions not being legally protected? Keep in mind, it's the GOVERNMENT suggesting he be fired for expressing his OPINION, not the general population exercising its right to an... more
                    • The category is hate speech.PH👀EY, Sun Sep 17 4:31pm
                      He can say what he wants. But it's outside of his job description, a vaunted position for which he has taken advantage to spew an untruth. I think he should be canned. If football players are going... more
                • Did they? Interesting perspective. (nm)Sprout, Fri Sep 15 3:34pm
                  • yet fail to inform yourself prior to entering a discussion. Not once, but several times. It's in interesting perspective you believe that paints you in a positive light. Since you're going to... more
                    • Is this thread for flippin' REAL?Sia☺giah, Sun Sep 17 12:09am
                      It was abundantly OBVIOUS what the topic of discussion was -- The WHITE HOUSE spokesman suggested that ESPN should FIRE their employee for criticizing the POTUS. It had absolutely NOTHING to do with... more