PH🙄👀EY
Let's correct that post:
Tue Oct 3, 2017 9:50am
166.182.66.104

The Second Amendment does not imply that the Citizenry ought to have personal ownership of howitzers and tanks. Other than that I see no need for gun laws except perhaps regarding FULLY automatic machine guns. Interesting the First and Second Amendments seem to have the least government leins. I do see Trump banning travel to various regions on the globe. I believe the Sixth Amendment GUARANTEES freedom of travel.....i.e. an obvious end run around a RIGHT of the People.

  • Let's start out by assuming we all agreePH🙄🙄EY, Tue Oct 3 9:43am
    that it makes no sense to assume the Second Amendment implies the People do not have right to own howitzers and tanks.
    • Let's correct that post: — PH🙄👀EY, Tue Oct 3 9:50am
      • Among all the lawful reasons the people should have a right to keep and bear arms, the Amendment specifically notes militia service as a reason why that right is necessary to a free state... So,... more
        • " Historically militia's will serve WITH standing military forces. I would certainly agree that militiamen are unlikely to be expected to arrive bringing tanks, howitzers, fighter jets, bombers, or... more
          • EVERBODY trained to whatever degree possible. Sometimes they had weapons, sometimes they were just farmers with pitchforks, but they were trying to prepare for if the German military did cross the... more
          • The US military hasn't TRULY been stressedSprout, Tue Oct 3 11:10am
            since WWII in terms of running EVERTHING they have to the max. Building weapons and vehicles as fast as possible, training recruits as fast as possible, pushing everything across the ocean as fast as ... more
          • Given the incredible high tech dmpowermentPH☠☠EY, Tue Oct 3 10:46am
            to the push button warriors, and the incredible massive destruction including conventional weapons, your post has the slight pallor of an antique concept. A responding militia in your scenario is... more
            • Yeah, that's what I saidJeeves, Tue Oct 3 10:58am
              " A responding militia in your scenario is passť, and irrelevant. " Exactly.
              • Different roles though...Sprout, Tue Oct 3 11:36am
                If we look at total war scenario's there are plenty of jobs that won't need front line troops, but would be better done by someone with a rifle who knows how to do it.
        • I was not specifically targeting PH👀EY, Tue Oct 3 10:21am
          Trump. But used his imperial edict as a example . The ban on travel to Cuba was unconstitutional. And a lot less complicated to grasp than the dodgey hair splitting parsing of terms re. the Second... more