What insanity?
Tue Oct 3, 2017 11:33pm

Automatic weapons are illegal. The Mandalay Hotel massacre was automatic fire, not legal guns. So what is all the hue and cry to ban legal private guns?? Why the leap? How can sutomatic machine guns be kept out of the hands of criminals and spook false flag operations? And none of this has a thing to do with the NRA.

  • What do you mean...wondering, Tue Oct 3 11:22pm
    by "public ownership of guns"? IMO, this is a very difficult topic to discuss because of all the possible scenarios, but it needs to be discussed. There are or should be limits. That's why we have... more
    • What insanity? — PH👻👻EY, Tue Oct 3 11:33pm
      • " The Mandalay Hotel massacre was automatic fire, not legal guns. " Nope. The deadliest shooting in modern US... more
        • That is the same device alledged to bePH💀💀EY, Wed Oct 4 1:01pm
          the faux reason for immolating 90 Branch Davidians back in 1993. So the weapon was alledgedly not a manufactured automatic. The fourth floor shooter was alledgedly using a end run device to... more
          • The device in question had not beenSprout, Wed Oct 4 1:25pm
            invented or on the market in 1993. Sorry.
            • I cannot argue with a gun expert.PH👁🔎👁EY, Fri Oct 6 12:54pm
              And won't try. But you do agree Vernon Howell failed to obtain a federal permit ($500) in order to be "legal" with a "bump stock" device that was available in 1993? That was a big part of the story.... more
              • I do not agree with that...Sprout, Fri Oct 6 1:05pm
                Because a tax stamp has never been $500. Sorry. That shows that the information you are being given is false. If the first part is false, how can I trust the rest of it? The story as I heard it was... more
                • The accusation was that hePH😳😳EY, Fri Oct 6 1:32pm
                  had an illegal device that could convert. That is why he invited the federal goons to come down and see for themselves. Maybe he had some kind of conversion kit. Are you saying there was no way to... more
                  • In 1993 there was no way to LEGALLY convertSprout, Fri Oct 6 2:27pm
                    a semi-automatic firearm to a fully automatic firearm unless you are a class III DEALER and it is being registered as a dealer sample. The ATF gets to inspect dealers, whether conventional or... more
                    • I know enough to know CS is banned.PH🔎👀🔎EY, Fri Oct 6 7:03pm
                      From your previous posts one might think it was impossible in 1993 to turn semi into fully. Now you admit it was a fact. Further, you are very flippant about how the ATF operates. There was a witness ... more
        • Why must you accuse a dead man of this crime?PH☠☠EY, Wed Oct 4 10:31am
          Where do you get your information this old man did this dirty deed? AP is known CIA connected liar operation. And has been a propaganda organ for many years. Do you bend over much? Or genuflect to... more
          • You automatically presume that all reports are lies, take the side of conspiracy theorists who rush out of the shadows every time something happens to claim that it's a false flag operation. WHERE do ... more
            • Why must you insult eyewitnesses?PH👁🔎👁EY, Thu Oct 5 4:04pm
              Your precious fake news mainstream media won't interview any who create the question that expose the conspiracy. INDY MEDIA WILL! Therefore I go there to many various sources to look for witness... more
              • Jeeves with your post? Plus, I didn't insult eyewitnesses, I asked if you realized how ridiculous it sounds to other readers ? You immediately dismissed every single report aside of your "Indy"... more
                • Solid evidence?PH🔎👁🔎EY, Fri Oct 6 10:14am
                  I think at least four cell phones at four locations are proof enough that there was at least three assassins. I mean what kind of standard of proof do require? Why is this ridiculous to other bbs... more
              • seem particularly disgusting. You're actually LYING and apparently willfully lying, to draw attention to yourself. Why?
                • out of line and inappropriate. I think he's WRONG, but I don't think he's lying. In fact, I'd wager that he honestly believes every word he's saying. That's NOT lying. At most, it's being mistaken.... more
                • There you go again.PH👁🙄👁EY, Thu Oct 5 4:57pm
                  I try to remain peaceful, granted snappish at times. Butt you have to stick your two cents worth in to create a disturbance based on your notion that you are not only a psychiatrist, but one who is... more
                  • And there you go again with more fake news.HeavyHemi, Thu Oct 5 11:51pm
                    Of course you didn't bother to link to your nonexistent videos. This is my last post to you ever. Your act is disgusting just another version of JB...probably where you got the idea. Same antics,... more
                    • Gosh, please please don't punish me😅PH👻🔎👻EY, Fri Oct 6 10:22am
                      And I have post links to my righteous assertions. Not with everybody. And it is tiresome to post links which no one cares to address as a discussion. I have to prime, nay..beg for a response. But,... more
                      • days ago? Where it was understood that we don't want nor appreciate ridiculous, ugly exchanges without the slightest merit or contribution to a discussion ? You might notice that I also chastised him ... more
                        • And I am in total agreement.PH👀EY, Fri Oct 6 1:36pm
                          My mistake was not ignoring him. Indeed, he is persona non grata. I will have no more dealings with him.
                          • We had a similar agreement over on R&E...and you violated it within 24 hours.
                            • Okay, I violated the R&E arrangement,PH🙄🙄EY, Fri Oct 6 5:45pm
                              a gentleman's agreement. That was there and then. Let's face it, you do not care for my brand of argument. And would prefer I disappear. I get it. But if I tell Siagiah I will not do but one tit for... more
                              • No one cares for that "brand of argument."Poppet, Fri Oct 6 5:54pm
                                To the degree that insults can be considered a "brand of argument," that is... Lay off insulting people who don't buy into your arguments, and that will put to rest most of my objections. Fail to do... more
                                • Without belaboring the issue,PH👀EY, Fri Oct 6 6:17pm
                                  some posters look for insults that are not there as any intent on my part. Some are perhaps a bit sensitive. Some are derisive of my esoteric issues. But I will attempt to correct my personality to a ... more
                          • harasses you in spite of you NOT responding in kind, we WILL deal with his behavior privately, which is how it SHOULD be, but usually CAN'T be when two, or more, are at fault for something... more
          • In court, and is tried and found guilty via the official story from law enforcement and the MSM propaganda tool. That is it! Everyone assumes. I assume too that we must not fall for yet another one... more
          • Because the Illuminati told me to do itJeeves, Wed Oct 4 10:36am
            I received their instructions through coded messages which only I can understand. I must obey.
            • Please do not try to marginalizePH👁👁EY, Wed Oct 4 10:49am
              my commentary with insipid insulting avoidance of reality. Apparently you do not understand very much about how false flag ops are carried out.