The device in question had not been
Wed Oct 4, 2017 1:25pm

invented or on the market in 1993. Sorry.

  • That is the same device alledged to bePH💀💀EY, Wed Oct 4 1:01pm
    the faux reason for immolating 90 Branch Davidians back in 1993. So the weapon was alledgedly not a manufactured automatic. The fourth floor shooter was alledgedly using a end run device to... more
    • The device in question had not been — Sprout, Wed Oct 4 1:25pm
      • I cannot argue with a gun expert.PH👁🔎👁EY, Fri Oct 6 12:54pm
        And won't try. But you do agree Vernon Howell failed to obtain a federal permit ($500) in order to be "legal" with a "bump stock" device that was available in 1993? That was a big part of the story.... more
        • I do not agree with that...Sprout, Fri Oct 6 1:05pm
          Because a tax stamp has never been $500. Sorry. That shows that the information you are being given is false. If the first part is false, how can I trust the rest of it? The story as I heard it was... more
          • The accusation was that hePH😳😳EY, Fri Oct 6 1:32pm
            had an illegal device that could convert. That is why he invited the federal goons to come down and see for themselves. Maybe he had some kind of conversion kit. Are you saying there was no way to... more
            • In 1993 there was no way to LEGALLY convertSprout, Fri Oct 6 2:27pm
              a semi-automatic firearm to a fully automatic firearm unless you are a class III DEALER and it is being registered as a dealer sample. The ATF gets to inspect dealers, whether conventional or... more
              • I know enough to know CS is banned.PH🔎👀🔎EY, Fri Oct 6 7:03pm
                From your previous posts one might think it was impossible in 1993 to turn semi into fully. Now you admit it was a fact. Further, you are very flippant about how the ATF operates. There was a witness ... more