No, he doesn't.
Mon Aug 13, 2018 5:33pm

He presented a known to be false video as evidence that something he believes happened. Then defends using it because, he believes that it happened -- is it because he saw it in the fake video ??? If there was other evidence of it, why use a fake video ?

HOW DOES THAT MAKE SENSE ?? It is circular logic and senseless.

Click here to receive daily updates