You Keep Repeating The Same Arguments...
Mon Mar 4, 2019 3:34pm (XFF:

...even after they've been countered.

I don't see a reason to keep repeating the counterarguments.

You can go back and reread them if you've forgotten them.

Suffice it to say that you are no more convincing just because you repeat the arguments again.


  • ...slam dunk to me is that in the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton was trying to assure Delegates that a President would not be immune to punishment and removal from office, as the British King... more
    • You Keep Repeating The Same Arguments... — Amadeus, Mon Mar 4 3:34pm
      • ...Hamilton DIDN'T Use "The President COULD BE indicted" to assure New York's Delegates that a President could be held to account for wrongdoing?
        • Why Couldn't A President Be Indicted?Amadeus, Mon Mar 4 3:58pm
          Why don't meteorologists tell us when it isn't going to rain orange juice? Amadeus
          • ...what COULDN'T happen, as it is to expect a Weatherman to say "It isn't going to rain Orange Juice". It's as stupid to expect the Constitution, which contains VERY DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS on how a... more
            • You're So Close...Amadeus, Mon Mar 4 10:16pm
              Is the President a citizen? Yes. The President must be a citizen according to the Constitution. Are all citizens bound by the law? Yes, all citizens are bound by the law. Is the President, then,... more
              • ...probably tell you to "P*ss off!" Since she thinks that "experts" "vehemently" and "enormously" disagree, you are not allowed to claim that you are correct... ...according to the Admin.
                • Actually no she's not disagreeing with opinions.HeavyHemi, Tue Mar 5 12:31pm
                  Here again we can read the posts and see that you are in fast being dishonest about the content of them. You have in fact claimed quotes that were not made to make your arguments. That is dishonest... more
            • Nope, this is complete nonsensiscal babbling.HeavyHemi, Mon Mar 4 5:35pm
              I mean if you understood whether the Constitution is prescriptive or proscriptive. Or perhaps if you quit conflating the concepts in your *arguments' in mid stride... You're really quite inept.
Click here to receive daily updates