GA: Supreme Court Appeal on Mental Illness Standard in Death
Thu Jul 19, 2012 16:26
Jul 17, 2012 3:00pm Supreme Court Appeal on Mental Illness Standard in Death Penalty Case
The Supreme Court is considering an emergency appeal today filed on the behalf of a Georgia death row inmate who claims he should not be put to death because he is mentally retarded.
The man, Warren Lee Hill Jr., is set to be executed Monday.
The case highlights a controversy stemming from a 2002 Supreme Court decision , Atkins v. Virginia. Although the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to execute mentally retarded individuals, it left it up to the individual states to determine how to assess mental retardation.
While many states use a standard called “preponderance of evidence,” Georgia is the only state to require a much stricter standard, “beyond a reasonable doubt” in making this assessment.
Hill was convicted in 1991 of using a board to beat and kill Joseph L. Handspike. Both men were inmates at the Lee State Prison in Lee County Georgia. At trial several prisoners testified that Hill mocked the victim as he beat him. Hill was serving a life sentence for murdering his former girlfriend by shooting her with a handgun.
Lawyers for Hill argue that a lower-court judge found that Hill had an IQ of 70 and was mentally retarded under the standard of “preponderance of evidence.”
In court papers they argue that their client faces imminent execution “despite the fact that a state court charged with determining whether Petitioner is mentally retarded, actually found Petitioner to be mentally retarded by a preponderance of the evidence.”
“Georgia forces people attempting to invoke the death ineligibility under Atkins v. Virginia, to prove mental retardation, beyond a reasonable doubt, an impossible standard by any meaningful reckoning , especially for psychiatric diagnoses, ” the lawyers say.
The Georgia Supreme Court upheld Hill’s sentence.
“In Atkins, the Supreme Court of the United States made clear that it was entrusting the states with the power to develop the procedures necessary to enforce the newly recognized federal constitutional ban on the execution of the mentally retarded, ” the court said.
The Georgia Supreme Court said that the Georgia General Assembly “remains within constitutional bounds in establishing a procedure for considering alleged mental retardation that limits the exemption to those whose mental deficiencies are significant enough to be provable beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Three judges writing in dissent note that Georgia was the first state in the nation to prohibit the execution of mentally retarded persons, but it is now the only state that requires condemned defendants to prove their retardation beyond a reasonable doubt. “The state may still execute people who are in all probably mentally retarded. The State may execute people who are more than likely mentally retarded. The state may even execute people who are almost certainly mentally retarded. Only if a mentally retarded person succeeds in proving their retardation beyond a reasonable doubt will his or her execution be halted, ” the dissent said.
Critics of Atkins think the Court should step in and clarify the ruling.
“The court has not shown much interest in wading back into the Atkins waters. I don’t’ know why it hasn’t. It’s been frustrating to watch as the promise of Atkins has been eroded in many states through the implementation of both definitions and procedures which make it virtually impossible to prove that anyone has mental retardation,” says John Henry Blume, a professor of Law at Cornell.
“Currently a person could be determined to have mental retardation in some states but not others.”
The problem says Robert D. Latzman, a clinical psychologist at Georgia State University, is that lawyers often look for black and white answers. “We don’t do that in the psychology world. We don’t play in yes and no’s we play in statistics and probability.
That makes ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ an impossible standard to attain.”
What is the difference between the standards? “It’s a matter of confidence in the diagnosis. Under the legal definition of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ the burden of proof is higher.”
The nephew of Handspike, Richard Handspike , has filed an affidavit saying that the victim’s family members were never contacted by the District Attorneys Office prosecuting the capital case and that the family believes that a sentence of life without parole would be the “appropriate and just resolution” in the case. ” The death penalty should not be imposed on Mr. Hill, in spite of what he did,” the affidavit says.
July 16, 2012 @ 1:34 | NYT Death Penalty Death Watch Unreasonable Doubt By ANDREW ROSENTHAL The state of Georgia seems confused. It doesn’t seem to get when it’s reasonable to expect proof “beyond a... more
Georgia rushes to carry out executions before lethal drug supply expires State's entire supply of pentobarbital runs out on March 1 with Georgia seeking permission from courts to block legal delays • ... more
Court lifts execution stay; st- ate out of lethal-injection drugs Posted: 10:13 a.m. Tuesday, April 23, 2013 BY BILL RANKIN - THE ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION The federal appeals court in Atlanta has ... more
The Death Row Torture Of Warren Hill When a prisoner faces the execution chamber four times in one year, is it not cruel and unusual punishment? Rania Khalek August 13, 2013 On July 18, one day... more
05/31/2013 Death Penalty and Mental Illness Will the Supreme Court Stop Georgia from Executing an Intellectually Disabled Man? By Brian Stull, ACLU Capital Punishment Project at 12:24pm When Georgia... more
EDITORIAL Final Plea for Mercy Published: February 13, 2013 Warren Lee Hill Jr., with an I.Q. of 70, is scheduled to be executed on Tuesday in Georgia. The Supreme Court should stay the execution, as ... more
Georgia will violate both justice and the constitution if it executes Warren Hill State law prohibits applying the death penalty to the 'mentally retarded', yet Georgia plows ahead, ignoring Hill's... more
GA: Supreme Court Appeal on Mental Illness Standard in Death Petra.,Thu Jul 19 16:26
Thursday, Feb. 14, 2013 State experts change opinions in condemned killer’s case By Bill Rankin Three experts used by the state to prove condemned killer Warren Hill was not mentally disabled — and... more
Georgia prisoner facing execution Tuesday By Matt Smith, CNN February 19, 2013 -- Updated 2126 GMT (0526 HKT) (CNN) -- Warren Lee Hill, whose defenders say he is mentally disabled, is scheduled to... more
Ga. executes man who killed college students 12:38a.m. EST February 22, 2013 JACKSON, Ga. (AP) — Georgia has executed a 38-year-old inmate convicted of killing two college students in 1995. Andrew... more
Warren Hill supporters call for late stay of execution for mentally ill prisoner Georgia set to execute Hill, who has been diagnosed with severe learning difficulties, in spite of criticism from... more
Ten reasons why Georgia should not execute Warren Hill Since the Guardian first listed in July the reasons why Hill – who has been classified as mentally disabled – should not be executed, the case... more
Posted: 11:44 a.m. Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013 Warren Hill stay of execution stands The U.S. Supreme Court denied the Georgia attorney general’s request to lift a stay of execution a federal appeals... more
Prisoner on death row appeals to Ga. Supreme Court KATE BRUMBACK, Associated Press Updated 04:13 p.m., Friday, July 20, 2012 ATLANTA (AP) — A lawyer for a Georgia prison inmate set to be executed... more