Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Dudley Sharp
Why future danger should be banned
Thu Nov 28, 2013 14:05

We know that all violent criminals have some probability of future danger.

So what?

Proving future danger is an added burden on the prosecutor and provides an additional avenue on appeal for the murderers.

Get rid of it. It is not constitutionally required.

The murders, by themsleves, should be sufficient, without any additonal burden.

I have always been against having to prove future danger, a costly, unecessary burden for the prosecutor.

  • Do you know about the 3 reasons you've had to die for in Texas in a capital case ? At least one is, the court needs someone who tells the jury, the guy is a further dangerous for the society .... or? ... more
    • Why future danger should be banned — Dudley Sharp, Thu Nov 28 14:05
      • Re: Why future danger should be bannedPetra., Thu Nov 28 14:18
        Yes I know you want ban all a civil society sees as murder by the state - we call it lynching .... revenge --- just an eye for an eye because you can't handle a lost. You teach killing is ok,... more
Click here to receive daily updates
List by Petra Hädrich-Kabacali (moderated)