Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
TX: New evidence in Rodney Reed case
Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:58

New evidence in Rodney Reed case highlights victim’s fiance
By David Barer
Published: October 23, 2015

AUSTIN (KXAN) — Attorneys for death-row inmate Rodney Reed have filed a motion in Bastrop district court stating they have found new evidence of a previously undisclosed investigation of the fiancé of murder victim Stacey Stites.

In a motion for discovery, Reed’s defense has submitted evidence from a recording of a January interview between the widow of a murdered Giddings police officer and a Bastrop and a Giddings investigator. The widow said, before her husband was killed, he was conducting an independent homicide investigation on Fennell, according to the motion.

The widow’s husband, former Giddings Police Officer Gary Joe Bryant—who was killed about six months after Stites—believed Fennell killed Stites, according to the documents. Bryant and Fennell both worked together at the Giddings Police Department in the mid-90s.

The woman “explained that her husband told her that he was investigating Jimmy Fennell—with the knowledge of at least one fellow Giddings policeman, Officer Nathan Lapham—and that Officer Bryant believed Fennell was guilty of the murder,” according to the motion for discovery.

Reed’s defense attorney Bryce Benjet said he is asking the Bastrop district court to allow him to conduct discovery, to obtain more evidence and information about Bryant’s investigation. More evidence of a “previously undisclosed investigation of Fennell” could help prove Reed’s innocence, the motion states.

“In this case, we received this recording from the Attorney General’s Office, and we believe the Attorney General’s Office very appropriately forwarded this information to us because it is relevant to the case,” said Benjet, a staff attorney for Innocence Project. “There is some evidence that an investigation was conducted in Giddings that we would like to find out about.”

The motion acknowledges that the widow explained she did not believe her husband’s initial suspicions were correct and Reed is guilty. However, the motion also suggests that those interviewing the widow either tried to discredit her or “persuade her not to provide information helpful to Mr. Reed.”

Bryant was killed in October of 1996, about six months after Stites’ murder. Authorities charged Mexican national Hector Manuel Mata-Mota of the crime, but the Third Court of Appeals ruled evidence did not support a capital murder charge, and Mata-Mota was deported “without ever standing trial for his alleged role in murdering Bryant,” according to the motion.

Lily Hughes, with the Save Rodney Reed Campaign, says while the evidence is promising, the case is wearing on Reed’s family.

“They’re tired,” said Hughes. “They want their loved one to come home and are a little beaten down by the process as it’s gone forward.”

April 23, 1996

Police found Stites strangled and left alongside a rural Bastrop road April 23, 1996.

Her fiance, Fennell, was the last person to see her before she left early that morning for work, court documents state. Investigators said Fennell was a suspect, but they never settled on him. After months of investigating, a match between DNA evidence found on Stites and Reed’s DNA led to his conviction for rape and murder.

Fennell worked as a Giddings police officer at the time Stites was killed. Later, as a Georgetown officer, Fennell was charged with sexual assault of a woman in his custody. He pleaded guilty to lesser charges of kidnapping and improper sexual activity, according to his attorney. Fennell is currently in prison.

Fennell has denied any role in Stites’ death. She was killed 10 days before the two were scheduled to marry.

Reed was set to be executed March 5. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas stayed his execution, and it is still reviewing items submitted by Reed’s defense, including an appeal of a denial for DNA testing and a writ of habeas corpus. It is not clear when the court of appeals will make a decision on those issues.

In its motion, the defense also seeks to “conduct depositions on two of the state’s trial witnesses,” Karen Blakely and Meghan Clement. Those two women evaluated the state’s forensic evidence related to Stites’ time of death.

The state’s case against Reed was based, in part, on former Travis County Chief Medical Examiner Roberto Bayardo’s time-of-death determination. Since the trial, however, Bayardo has recanted his time-of-death estimate as well as his determination on sexual assault. The defense says the state should not rely on Blakely’s and Clement’s findings, which were based on Bayardo’s work.

  • A death delayed: Rodney Reed now eyes exoneration, end to ‘racist’ justice On eve of his scheduled execution – now stayed — condemned man speaks to Al Jazeera on his case and the justice system March ... more
    • TX: New evidence in Rodney Reed case — Petra., Mon Oct 26 12:58
      • TX: TV interview could help death rowPetra, Tue Sep 12 12:56
        (CNN)Rodney Reed has spent nearly two decades on Texas' death row for the 1996 murder of Stacey Stites, which he insists he didn't commit. Now, he may get a chance at a new trial. A Texas court has... more
        • TX: NEW DETAILS RODNEY REED CASEPetra, Sun Mar 4 12:26
          NEW DETAILS RODNEY REED CASE Reed case figure Fennell to be freed Ex-cop was suspect in fiancée’s death till DNA tied it to Reed. By Chuck Lindell Jimmy Fennell (left) had... more
      • State opposes defense motion for new evidence in Reed case Friday, Nov. 6, 2015  State prosecutors have come out against a recent motion filed by defense attorneys for death row inmate Rodney ... more
Click here to receive daily updates
List by Petra Hädrich-Kabacali (moderated)