Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Merlin
A Renaissance on the Right
Fri Apr 13, 2018 7:57am
24.228.93.156

https://nyti.ms/2GXHyTb

By David Brooks

A Renaissance on the Right

What’s bad for the gavel is good for the pen. The Republican Party is in the midst of a cataclysmic transformation. But all the political turmoil is creating a burst of intellectual creativity on the right.

Young, fresh writers are bursting on the scene: Sohrab Ahmari, Helen Andrews, Charles Cooke, Mollie Hemingway, Jason Willick, Michael Brendan Dougherty, Gracy Olmstead, James Poulos, Oren Cass, Matthew Schmitz and many others.

Suddenly fundamental issues, like the values of the liberal democratic order itself, are up for debate. Some conservatives are laying down comprehensive critiques of the way our society is organized. Modern liberal capitalism is too soulless, they say, too atomizing, too destructive of basic institutions like family, faith and village that give life meaning. Liberal individualism doesn’t produce the sort of virtuous, self-restrained people that are required to sustain it.

Other conservatives are rising to defend that order, including National Review’s Jonah Goldberg, who later this month comes out with his epic and debate-shifting book, “Suicide of the West.”



Goldberg points out that for eons human beings were semi-hairless upright apes clumped in tribes and fighting for food. But about 300 years ago something that he calls “the Miracle” happened. It was a shift in attitude. For thousands of years, societies divided people into permanent categories of race or caste. But, Goldberg writes, “the Miracle ushered in a philosophy that says each person is to be judged and respected on account of their own merits, not the class or caste of their ancestors.”

That belief, championed by John Locke, or a story we tell about Locke, paved the way for human equality, pluralism, democracy, capitalism and the idea that a person can have a plurality of identities and a society can contain a plurality of moral creeds.

It also proved to be the goose that laid the golden egg. Economic growth exploded. The American founding asserted that Lockean ideas are universal. And nothing had ever succeeded like America. Between 1860 and 1900 alone, America’s population doubled and its wealth grew fivefold.

But we have stopped teaching about the Miracle, Goldberg says, and stopped feeling grateful for it.

Tribalism was always there, lurking under the surface. It returns now as identity politics, which is reactionary reversion to the pre-modern world. Identity politics takes individual merit out of the moral center of our system and asserts that group is, Goldberg says, “an immutable category, a permanent tribe.” Identity politics warriors claim they are fighting for social justice, but really it’s just the same old thing, Goldberg argues, a mass mobilization to gain power for the tribe.

Earlier movements wanted America to live up to its ideals. Today’s identitarians doubt the liberal project itself.

Identity politics gained traction on the left, but now the Trumpian right has decided to fight fire with fire. Populism is a form of identity politics because it’s based on in-group/out-group distinctions. It says anybody who doesn’t think or look like us is not a true American.

This tribal mentality is tearing the civic fabric and creates a war of what Goldberg thinks of as “ecstatic schadenfreude” — the exaltation people feel when tribal foes are brought down.

I love the way Goldberg provocatively tells his story, but I partially disagree with it. The central tension in his book is between Locke, who emerges as a rational, calm, pipe-smoking economist, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who emerges as a wild-haired, passionately resentful rock star. The liberal order emerges from the individualism of Locke and is threatened by group consciousness and romantic resentments of Rousseau.

But America is both rational and romantic, both Locke and Rousseau. We have a rationalist constitution, but we have a shared national faith and are an emotional community, rooted in our land, inspired by our history, warmed by the hope of our common future.

The core problem today is not tribalism. It’s excessive individualism, which has eaten away at our uniting faith and damaged our relationships with one another. Excessive individualism has left us distrustful and alone — naked Lockeans. When people are naked and alone they revert to tribe. Tribalism is the end product of excessive individualism.

Goldberg is suspicious of nationalism and has a tendency to think that any effort to build a national community puts you on the express lanes on the road to serfdom.

His conservatism is missing the bonding sentiments of Edmund Burke, and the idea that the little platoon of the family is nestled in the emotional platoon of the neighborhood and the emotional platoon of the nation. Tribalism is not the only way to form a group; there’s also the redeeming and forgiving love of community, and a shared national faith. Goldberg misses the way Hamilton, Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt built a national community that didn’t crush local communities but rather reinforced them.

Goldberg is right to fight tribalism on the left and the right. But you can’t reweave a fragmented nation by appealing just to Lockean individualism. Gratitude is too weak a glue to hold a diverse nation together. Renewal will come through the communitarians on the right and the left, who seek ways to improve relationships on a household, local and national level.

One simple and easy way that can be implemented immediately is to cease and desist degrading relationships.

    • demands that, and more. When the former finally decide to cut-off or cut-back the latter, they "fight" with their most potent weapon: Tears. Of rage. Of grief. Or mirtth... Whatever is needed to keep ... more
    • It Seems Goldberg's View... ~ Amadeus, Fri Apr 13 10:14am
      ...of history is strangely convenient. The tribalism was always there. But when political power is securely vested in a powerful majority, and minorities are carefully oppressed and marginalized, it... more
      • Oh? And it's so much better now? ~ TW, Fri Apr 13 10:23am
        Serve 'em up MJ! Another heapng helping of oppressed and marginalized victims for the nation! All ethnicities and sexes occupy every strata of our society. Who is being oppressed when anyone and... more
        • I Don't Recall Saying That... ~ Amadeus, Fri Apr 13 1:52pm
          In some respects, things are better. In others, not so much. We do have a lot of factionalizing and partisanship. The data shows that minorities continue to have trouble making it to the top. I know... more
        • He serves a different god, TW. ~ shadow, Fri Apr 13 10:48am
          Don't expect a vision of truth.
          • I Thought I Was Done, But... ~ Amadeus, Fri Apr 13 2:03pm
            I'm not. Your post was pointless, shadow. It existed ONLY to hurt me. It existed ONLY to insult me. That is what you have become. Now, because I know this, and because my expectations for you have... more
          • I Thought You Were Christian, Shadow... ~ Amadeus, Fri Apr 13 1:53pm
            When did that change? Amadeus
    • family and relationships than one could possibly imagine. They have long been the party that's done its best to turn the melting pot into the tossed salad. Creating as many victims as possible so the ... more
  • Click here to receive daily updates