Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Mondo Fuego™
This will stick in Hammer's and Merlin's craws
Sun Nov 4, 2018 5:26pm
68.114.132.44

To a couple of partisan nerds: Your erroneous judgment of Brett Kavanaugh was based solely on your irrational prejudice against President Donald Trump.

Choke, baby, choke! Nee-nar-nee-nar-nee-nar, and poo-poo to you two.

~*~*~*~

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/senate-judiciary-panel-says-no-evidence-found-to-support-accusations-against-kavanaugh/ar-BBPkcRU?ocid=ientp

Senate Judiciary panel says no evidence found to support accusations against Kavanaugh

Megan Keller - 1 hr ago

The Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report, in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.

"Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process," the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.

"In neither the committee's investigation nor in the supplemental background investigation conducted by the FBI was there ANY evidence to substantiate or corroborate any of the allegations."

The committee investigators "found no verifiable evidence that supported" Christine Blasey Ford's allegation that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed in the early 1980s and attempted to remove her clothes while covering her mouth with one hand.

"The witnesses that Dr. Ford identified as individuals who could corroborate her allegations failed to do so, and in fact, contradicted her," the report notes.

It also states that committee investigators "found no verifiable evidence" to support Deborah Ramirez's claim that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a party when they were both at Yale.

The report additionally dismisses allegations from Julie Swetnick, forwarded by lawyer Michael Avenatti.

"Indeed, the evidence appears to support the position that Julie Swetnick and Mr. Avenatti criminally conspired to make materially false statements to the Committee and obstruct the Committee's investigation," the report writes.

Avenatti and Swetnick have both been referred to the Department of Justice for potential criminal investigations into their behavior during Kavanaugh's confirmation process. Avenatti was referred a second time for his actions.

In addition, the report details that investigators were also unable to locate supporting evidence for the several anonymous accusations against Kavanaugh, noting that one of the accusers has been referred for a criminal investigation.


Kavanaugh passionately denied all of the allegations against him and was ultimately confirmed after a brutal confirmation fight on Oct. 7 by a vote largely down party lines.


    • when Michael Avenatti's name was mentioned in the allegation.
    • but an attack on the US Supreme Court, and definitely conspired to create division and disunity between political philosophies. I hope those referred for further investigation for their lies are... more
    • But they didn't spend years investigating... ~ ARXET the TRAITOR DUMocrat, Sun Nov 4 5:29pm
      …...and talk to all 350 million Americans to see if ANYONE has any real evidence other than the partisan lies of that activist DUMocrat wh0re. As Trish would say, they should have investigated Blasey ... more
  • Click here to receive daily updates