Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Chrisv
Re: assuming for purpoes of discussion . . .
Sat Jan 6, 2018 5:52am
2600:100e:b14b:4ee4:116d:e32d:ee3e:a56e

Dan
Mistakes happen I agree. To this degree, we will see. I have done my research. The signatures are in kew. No speculation needed

Mr. Penny did not get him the signatures. No speculation needed

Ask your protege if he has been to the national archives

Chris

  • assuming for purpoes of discussion . . .Daniel Buck, Sat Jan 6 5:43am
    Chris. Let's assume for purposes of discussion that the 1902 Honorius crew list is held at Kew not Newfoundland, so what? It's not unreasonable to see how a researcher, communicating with both... more
    • A good rough draftneglib, Sat Jan 6 7:37am
      I'm sure if I wrote this and had it published, you would would not be so kind. There is more than just a typo in the end note. The story of the "hunt" is inaccurate. According to what you said in a... more
      • If you published anything ? Mark Mszanski, Mon Jan 8 2:34pm
        I would be supportive. Its tough work if you can get it . I look forward to your next article. I don't write and research to make money. I do it as I like the chase. When I have time , I do what I... more
        • in the medianeglib, Tue Jan 9 2:06pm
          You weren't so kind to the RR pic we researched. I doubt anything will change. It must have been pretty awesome to see the crew log in person in Kew. Brett
Click here to receive daily updates