Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
ChrisV
14% of your endnotes are bad.
Mon Jan 8, 2018 3:11pm
75.169.157.245

Mark,
I hate to say it, but its not just end note number 30. It is also endnotes: 32,33,34,36,37

How about showing us the receipt from the National Archives? When you were at Kew last summer, did you see the logbook? Must have been quite the experience if you did.

After discussing this with a MHA representative, Kew and MHA are two separate organizations. Kew is not the mother organization of MHA as you mentioned.

I wish this error had not been made, as it has cost the National Archive staff, MHA staff, Mr. Penney of MHA, Brett, myself, and you a lot of wasted time trying to correct this. However, the main thing is we were able to get it corrected.
best,
Chris

  • Your reference to end note number 30 Mark Mszanski, Sun Jan 7 9:37am
    Chris - I believe your correct. At least I believe one end note number (30 ) should say Kew and not MHA which was an oversight by me in referring to 42 end notes as sources in my article. There are... more
    • 14% of your endnotes are bad. — ChrisV, Mon Jan 8 3:11pm
    • Another oversightneglib, Mon Jan 8 5:56am
      You've visited the National Archives but you haven't taken the time to see the log while you were there? Brett
Click here to receive daily updates