Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Daniel Buck
Re: Dan,Amigo
Tue Apr 10, 2018 12:00pm

on the question of where Murray and Walters were on the night of the 3rd, I'm not interpreting anything, I'm reporting what Carlos Pero said.

One could make a simpler argument, one that eliminates the necessity of involving either Murray or Walters in the hold up, which is that it was Cassidy and Sundance using the names Murray and Walters who were innocently passing through, arrested, and released. Small wrinkle, tho, their signatures are on legal documents in the Expediente and they bear no resemblance to the signatures of Cassidy and Sundance. Dan

  • Dan,AmigoPat, Tue Apr 10 11:42am
    It is your interpretation. I can send them entire police report to anyone who wants so they can read for themselves. It is not as you say. My hand got the best of me : Tupiza
    • Re: Dan,Amigo — Daniel Buck, Tue Apr 10 12:00pm
      • That's your interpretation.Pat, Tue Apr 10 2:42pm
        I prefer to have others reading themselves. You have no proof that Walter's and Murray is English, Gringo'.s or martians. Nor you you know who they really were? No passports, no jobs, nothing. No do... more
        • we fight with the evidence we have . . . .Daniel Buck, Tue Apr 10 3:52pm
          Pat, Wow, you re absolutely correct. I was not in the Tupiza region in November 1908. If I had been I would have bastinadoed the hell out of Murray & Walters and got the truth out of them. For all we ... more
Click here to receive daily updates